Set of Dask benchmarks run daily at scale in Coiled Clusters.
The coiled benchmarks
test suite can be run locally with the following steps:
dask-benchmarks
Coiled
account and the Coiled Dask Engineering AWS S3 account.mamba env create -n test-env -f ci/environment.yml
. You could alternatively use
different packages, e.g. if you are testing feature branches of dask or distributed.
This test suite is configured to run Coiled's package_sync
feature, so your local
environment will be copied to the cluster.conda activate test-env
Some tests require additional dependencies:
mamba env update -f ci/environment-snowflake.yml
mamba env update -f ci/environment-tpch-nondask.yml
Look at ci/environment-*.yml
for more options.
mamba env update -f ci/environment-git-tip.yml
mamba env update -f ci/environment-test.yml
python -m pytest tests
.
You may consider running instead individual tests or categories of tests; e.g.
python -m pytest tests -m shuffle_p2p
.
Look at setup.cfg
for all available test markers.Additionally, tests are automatically run on pull requests to this repository. See the section below on creating pull requests.
The coiled-benchmarks
test suite contains a series of pytest fixtures which enable
benchmarking metrics to be collected and stored for historical and regression analysis.
By default, these metrics are not collected and stored, but they can be enabled
by including the --benchmark
flag in your pytest invocation.
From a high level, here is how the benchmarking works:
benchmark_schema.py
dashboard.py
creates a set of static HTML documents showing historical data for the tests.You can collect benchmarking data by running pytest with the --benchmark
flag.
This will create a local benchmark.db
sqlite file in the root of the repository.
If you run a test suite multiple times with benchmarking,
the data will be appended to the database.
You can compare with historical data by downloading the global database from S3 first:
aws s3 cp s3://coiled-runtime-ci/benchmarks/benchmark.db ./benchmark.db
pytest --benchmark
To get going with the TPC-H benchmarks, checkout the README here
You can add, remove, or modify columns by editing the SQLAlchemy schema in benchmark_schema.py
.
However, if you have a database of historical data, then the schemas of the new and old data will not match.
In order to account for this, you must provide a migration for the data and commit it to the repository.
We use alembic
to manage SQLAlchemy migrations.
In the simple case of simply adding or removing a column to the schema, you can do the following:
# First, edit the `benchmark_schema.py` and commit the changes.
alembic revision --autogenerate -m "Description of migration"
git add alembic/versions/name_of_new_migration.py
git commit -m "Added a new migration"
Migrations are automatically applied in the pytest runs, so you needn't run them yourself.
At times you might change a specific test that makes older benchmarking data irrelevant. In that case, you can discard old benchmarking data for that test by applying a data migration removing that data:
alembic revision -m "Declare bankruptcy for <test-name>"
# Edit the migration here to do what you want.
git add alembic/versions/name_of_new_migration.py
git commit -m "Bankruptcy migration for <test-name>"
An example of a migration that does this is here.
We have a number of pytest fixtures defined which can be used to automatically track certain metrics in the benchmark database. The most relevant ones are summarized here:
benchmark_time
: Record wall clock time duration.
benchmark_memory
: Record memory usage.
benchmark_task_durations
: Record time spent computing, transferring data, spilling to disk, and deserializing data.
get_cluster_info
: Record cluster id, name, etc.
benchmark_all
: Record all available metrics.
For more information on all available fixtures and examples on how to use them, please refer to their documentation.
Writing a new benchmark fixture would generally look like:
test_run_benchmark
fixture, which yields an ORM object.yield
ing to the testThe benchmark_time
fixture provides a fairly simple example.
It is not always obvious what the cause of a seeming performance regression is.
It could be due to a new version of a direct or transitive dependency,
and it could be due to a change in the Coiled platform.
But often it is due to a change in dask
or distributed
.
If you suspect that is the case, Coiled's package_sync
feature combines well with the benchmarking infrastructure here and git bisect
.
The following is an example workflow which could be used to identify a specific commit in dask
which introduced a performance regression.
This workflow presumes you have two terminal windows open, one with the coiled-runtime
test suite,
and one with a dask
repository with which to drive bisecting.
You should create a software environment which can run this test suite, but with an
editable install of dask
.
You can do this in any of a number of ways, but one approach coule be
mamba env create -n test-env --file ci/environment.yml # Create a test environment
conda activate test-env # Activate your test environment
mamba env update --file ci/environment-test.yml
(cd <your-dask-dir> && pip install -e .) # Do an editable install for dask
Let's say the current HEAD
of dask
is known to be bad, and $REF
is known to be
good. If you are looking at an upstream run where you have access to the static page,
you can check the dates reported for each run and do a git log
with the corresponding
dates to get a list of commits to use in the bisecting process.
git log --since='2022-08-15 14:15' --until='2022-08-18 14:15' --pretty=oneline
In the terminal opened to your dask repository you can initialize a bisect workflow with
cd <your-dask-dir>
git bisect start
git bisect bad
git bisect good $REF
Now that your editable install is bisecting, run a test or subset of tests which
demonstrate the regression in your coiled-runtime
terminal.
Presume that tests/benchmarks/test_parquet.py::test_write_wide_data
is such a test:
pytest tests/benchmarks/test_parquet.py::test_write_wide_data --benchmark
Once the test is done, it will have written a new entry to a local sqlite file benchmark.db
.
You will want to check whether that entry displays the regression.
Exactly what that check will look like will depend on the test and the regression.
You might have a script that builds a chart from benchmark.db
similar to dashboard.py
,
or a script that performs some kind of statistical analysis.
But let's assume a simpler case where you can recognize it from the average_memory
.
You can query that with
sqlite3 benchmark.db "select dask_version, average_memory from test_run where name = 'test_write_wide_data';"
If the last entry displays the regression, mark the commit in your dask terminal as bad
:
git bisect bad
If the last entry doesn't display the regression, mark the commit in your dask terminal as good
:
git bisect good
Proceed with this process until you have narrowed it down to a single commit. Congratulations! You've identified the source of your regression.
It's possible to run the Coiled Runtime benchmarks for A/B comparisons. Read full documentation.
This repository uses GitHub Actions secrets for managing authentication tokens used to
access resources like Coiled clusters, S3 buckets, etc. However, because GitHub Actions
doesn't grant access to secrets for forked
repositories,
please submit pull requests directly from the coiled/benchmarks
repository, not a
personal fork.