commoncriteria / application

Protection Profile for Application Software
The Unlicense
9 stars 3 forks source link

Sort out where crypto reqs should be, for apps which provide their own DAR #10

Closed jeffblank closed 10 years ago

jeffblank commented 10 years ago

Need to take action per DISA FSO comment: FMT_MEC_EXT.1.2: Strike this requirement or provide additional explantion of its objectives in an application note. This requirement seems to preclude apps that provide FIPS-validated data storage containers when the OS does not provide FIPS-validated cryptographic modules for data-at-rest. Such apps may be among the most important to have NIAP-evaluated. FPT_API_EXT.1 includes the phrase "unless providing cryptographic services is the purpose of the application" but a similar exception is lacking here.

Note: We need to sync with FE PP developers on this, in case this will be covered in other PP.

jeffblank commented 10 years ago

Other commenters also raised this issue. Need to get with Cara.

kgal commented 10 years ago

What about apps that make SSL keys and the like?

bourdett commented 10 years ago

got with cara and i think we have all the crypto requirements included now