Closed jbcaillau closed 1 week ago
I would say that it would be great to use them but to have the classical CI in backup, putting some priorities.
Still we would need to check whether the performance of the runners is the same as with GitHub runners. Having the backup should be yaml piece of cake 🤞🏾
Contacted sergen.cansiz@inria.fr ✅
@ocots @PierreMartinon @gergaud fruitful exchange with @srcansiz and @j-l-s today. meeting scheduled Aug. 26 9:00 to try to deploy on a test repo (maybe not OptimalControl.jl but a subpackage - CTBase.jl...) https://inria.webex.com/meet/jean-baptiste.caillau
Retex from another Inria project: Inria self-hosted runners (= the slaves we used during the ADT) should be faster than those from GitHub 🤞🏾
I do not have access to the Settings
page of CTBase (or any other) repo, to create a new self hosted runner.
Do I have the correct access rights to the organisation/repos ?
I do not have access to the
Settings
page of CTBase (or any other) repo, to create a new self hosted runner. Do I have the correct access rights to the organisation/repos ?
Should be ok now.
Not really: I would like to add a Runner to the organisation (control-toolbox), so it can be shared with all repositories. It need "Owner" credentials for it..
PS: I have access to https://github.com/control-toolbox/CTBase.jl/settings
, but no menu "Runners" on this page...
PPS: not emergency for that, I just wanted to anticipate the meeting with JBC
Full power entrusted, mr Sz 😱
Instead of exchanging in this issue, I started a conversation here: https://github.com/orgs/control-toolbox/discussions/59
See email exchange with @j-l-s (July 23, 2024)