Closed scuy closed 8 years ago
Is the "broader" term sufficient for this?
{
"_index": "aat",
"_type": "terms",
"_id": "300253481",
"_score": 1,
"_source": {
"prefLabels": [
{
"label": "tankhouses",
"lang": "es"
},
{
"label": "tankhouses",
"lang": "nl"
},
{
"label": "tankhouses",
"lang": "en"
},
{
"label": "tankhouse",
"lang": "es"
},
{
"label": "tankhouse",
"lang": "nl"
},
{
"label": "tankhouse",
"lang": "en"
}
],
"prefLabel": "tankhouses",
"providerMappings": [],
"id": "300253481",
"broader": [
{
"prefLabel": "water towers",
"id": "300006204",
"uri": "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300006204"
}
],
"uri": "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300253481",
"altLabels": [],
"scopeNote": "Water towers wholly or partly boxed in by walls; the interior spaces of the tower below are thus available for, for example, storage or offices."
}
},
In order to be able to find all narrower terms when searching for a broader term, it would be good if we could include not only the parent term, but all ancestors.
which broader ? There are two different types of broader terms (generic, preffered)
Sorry, I was on the wrong track here, I thought this was about the resources index. I think we only need the direct parent in the AAT index. So I would say: yes, this is sufficient.
great :+1:
There should be a link to the parent subject so that the "what" browse section can reproduce the hierarchy of the Getty AAT for the referenced concepts.