Closed Frijol closed 5 years ago
I'd like us to consider introducing anything we post with a "You can do this with your collaborators!" frame that would:
Perhaps we could ask people to link their own discussion notes back here (somewhere?) with any top level points they'd like to share out to all pursuing the theme.
Experiments with decentralizing tough discussions to other groups of close collaborators, then sharing back learnings to a broader interested public! Interested to hear more ideas and improvements toward this.
Someone (@Mr0grog?) asked about intended audience
Definitely not me (passing the buck to @dcwalk…?), though I think it was a good point.
+1 to all this. In terms or process and timeline, it seems we'd want to publish before the next month's scheduled reading. 2 weeks to decompress and put together a draft, 1 week for everyone to offer additions/context/etc., and 1 week to finalize and post???
We should also link to video. Jake said he watched "Knowledge Commons" and it interested him enough to join "Civics".
Approval: I think we can follow the governance doc for quotidian decisions and just get a thumbs up from a representative from each Partner. I don't think we should get consensus from each person quoted because that would take forever. Individuals should have their say during the editing/commenting phase. So making sure ample notice and time to do so is important, but we should be ok with a deadline!
Authorship: Think it should be whoever put work into the draft and anybody who spent time editing & wants to be noted, then just slap a Data Together
on the end.
Authorship– EDGI Protocol has much to say here, but I'd like help figuring it out. Do we want to use that same authorship protocol?
Is there somewhere I can learn more about EDGI Protocol? I found this issue to make it public. I imagine this is mostly in EDGI's hands, but let me know if it would help to have somebody on the outside go over any of it.
Thanks folks! Attentive to the challenges of cadence, here's a proposed timeline for this post:
Currently investigating how to get a blog working on our hugo site with intent to post there after edits (and also using Rob's GDocs to Markdown conversion tool)
Heads up that in the future I'll just collect comments & edits on a hackmd so as to avoid markdown > gdocs > markdown!
I wrote a blog post from the first DT reading group of the semester! We talked about it a bit at the end of the Civics call & @b5 suggested we continue the conversation asynchronously.
Based on our discussions so far, it sounds like we want to move this toward publication đź’«
So– what's next?
Blog post basics:
More ideas:
I'm happy to collaborate & keep building this with any of you who have time in the near future. But I'd also like to get it published without too much ado! We're doing these reading groups monthly, and I'm planning to get started writing the next post in the next week :)
cc also @ericnost @rgardaphe @dcwalk @lightandluck (with apologies to anyone I've missed or ideas not highlighted)
But here's the key question:
What do you all think are the right/necessary steps between here and publication?