deep-diver / semantic-segmentation-ml-pipeline

Machine Learning Pipeline for Semantic Segmentation with TensorFlow Extended (TFX) and various GCP products
https://blog.tensorflow.org/2023/01/end-to-end-pipeline-for-segmentation-tfx-google-cloud-hugging-face.html
Apache License 2.0
93 stars 20 forks source link
mlops semantic-segmentation tensorflow tfx vertex-ai

Python TFX Validity Check for Training Pipeline Trigger Training Pipeline

Semantic Segmentation model within ML pipeline

This repository shows how to build a Machine Learning Pipeline for Semantic Segmentation with TensorFlow Extended (TFX) and various GCP products such as Vertex Pipeline, Vertex Training, Vertex Endpoint. Also, the ML pipeline contains a custom TFX component that is integrated with Hugging Face 🤗 Hub - HFPusher. HFPusher pushes a trained model to 🤗 Model Hub and, optionally Gradio application to 🤗 Space Hub with the latest model out of the box.

NOTE: We use U-NET based TensorFlow model from the official tutorial. Since we implement an ML pipeline, U-NET like model could be a good starting point. Other SOTA models like SegFormer from 🤗 Transformers or DeepLabv3+ will be explored later.

NOTE: The aim of this project is not to serve the most SoTA segmentation model. Our main focus is to demonstrate how to build an end-to-end ML pipeline for semantic segmentation task instead.

Update 17/02/2023: This project received the #TFCommunitySpotlight award.

Update 18/01/2023: We published a blogpost on the TensorFlow blog discussing this project: End-to-End Pipeline for Segmentation with TFX, Google Cloud, and Hugging Face.

Project structure

project
│
└───notebooks
│   │   gradio_demo.ipynb 
│   │   inference_from_SavedModel.ipynb # test inference w/ Vertex Endpoint
│   │   parse_tfrecords_pets.ipynb # test TFRecord parsing
│   │   tfx_pipeline.ipynb # build TFX pipeline within a notebook
│
└───tfrecords
│   │   create_tfrecords_pets.py # script to create TFRecords of PETS dataset
│
└───training_pipeline
    └───apps # Gradio app template codebase    
    └───models # contains files related to model    
    └───pipeline # definition of TFX pipeline

Inside training_pipeline the entrypoints for the pipeline runners are defined in kubeflow_runner.py and local_runner.py.

Instructions

The TFX pipeline is designed to be run on both of local and GCP environments.

On local environment

$ cd training_pipeline
$ tfx pipeline create --pipeline-path=local_runner.py \
                      --engine=local
$ tfx pipeline compile --pipeline-path=local_runner.py \
                       --engine=local
$ tfx run create --pipeline-name=segformer-training-pipeline \ 
                 --engine=local

On Vertex AI environment

There are two ways to run TFX pipeline on GCP environment(Vertex AI).

First, you can run it manually with the following CLIs. In this case, you should replace GOOGLE_CLOUD_PROJECT to your GCP project ID in training_pipeline/pipeline/configs.py beforehand.

$ cd training_pipeline
$ tfx pipeline create --pipeline-path=kubeflow_runner.py \
                      --engine=vertex
$ tfx pipeline compile --pipeline-path=kubeflow_runner.py \
                       --engine=vertex
$ tfx run create --pipeline-name=segformer-training-pipeline \ 
                 --engine=vertex \ 
                 --project=$GCP_PROJECT_ID \
                 --regeion=$GCP_REGION

Using GitHub Actions

You can use workflow_dispatch feature of GitHub Action to run the pipeline on Vertex AI environment as well. In this case, go to the action tab, then select Trigger Training Pipeline on the left pane, then Run workflow on the branch of your choice. The GCP project ID in the input parameters will automatically replace the GOOGLE_CLOUD_PROJECT in training_pipeline/pipeline/configs.py. Also it will be injected to the tfx run create CLI.

For further understading about how GitHub Action is implemented, please refer to its README document.

To-do

Misc notes

On the use of two different datasets

Initially, we started our work with the Sidewalks dataset. This dataset contains different stuff and things and is also very high-resolution in nature. To keep the runtime of our pipeline faster and to experiment quicker, we settled with a shallow UNet architecture (from this tutorial). This is why, we also downsampled the Sidewalks dataset quite a bit (128x128, 256x256, etc.). But this led to poor quality models.

To circumvent around this, we used the PETS dataset where the effects of downsampling weren't that visible compared to Sidewalks.

But do note that the approaches showcases in our pipeline can easily be extended to high-resolution segmentation datasets and different model architectures (as long as they can be serialized as a SavedModel).

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the ML Developer Programs team at Google that provided GCP support.