Closed smasonlawrence closed 2 months ago
Ok, so I have some questions.
Also is that image generated from the sampling option of the trainer? I see you had it enabled in the toml; if yes then try on the tool you use to generage instead of trainer's sampler.
I'm trying to train the actress Vanessa Lengies, I have 344 images, all high quality and cropped to her head or body. My captions are similar to this: vlengies, 1girl, solo, smile, brown hair, realistic, brown eyes, looking at viewer, long hair, lips, grin, teeth, upper body, curly hair
I ran it through SD with the attached out put, its okay..
but hardly looks like the spitting image of what she actually looks like.
I don't train photorealism so I can't help you further, sorry.
Ok figured it out I think, the sampler in LoRA Easy Training Scripts output looks horrible for some reason, running it through SD with the actual training check point looks 100% better. So the checkpoint of the lora i was using had too many steps, but I couldnt tell that from the sample image that was generated by LoRA ETS. But in SD, I ran it at different strength's and found that it was over baked. So a strength of 0.6 was ideal. Just posting this if anybody else ever has a similar issue, the take away is this:
Final output image at 0.6 strenth is below, looks a lot better.
just a note, the sample code is code kohya, the creator of the underlying system this uses, made. Personally, I don't use samples at all, instead preferring to just test in auto1111 instead.
Hi All, since there isn't a discussion board here I guess I'll have to put this under issues. Anybody able to offer some insight as to how I can improve my quality? I'm just overall not that impressed with the results. toml and output result attached... any suggestions on better settings to improve results?
vlengies.toml.txt