Closed pfey03 closed 5 years ago
Another thought: If we have public DDB PROTEIN IDs, those should probably be replacing the UniProt ID. However, it might take a while until we have that mapping and if it's easiest to link gene ID we can do that first.
When I looked at the S. pombe pages for annotation extensions, I think for all displays in 'with' and extensions, we should use our GENE NAMES. Is the most informative and as Bob pointed out, users do not have to click if they see and recognize the partners right there.
A second issue of 'with' field: When there is >1 ID in the 'with' field, then display all this genes, comma separated, in the same annotation.
I have now started using gene IDs in with field and extensions as P2Go accepts them already for a while. So if UniProt ID convert to gene name, and if dictyBase gene ID, also convert to gene names on display
tgrB1 is an example for a mix of UniProt Ids for some older annotations and DDB_G Ids for newer annotations
Currently our GO annotation display has the linked UniProt ID in the 'with' field. This means it links out to UniProt. It concerns mainly IPI and IGI annotations. See example of IPI annotations here: http://dictybase.org/gene/ctxA/go