Open balmas opened 6 years ago
From @PonteIneptique on September 10, 2017 5:48
From @PonteIneptique on September 13, 2017 9:32
Duplicate of #3 ?
From @jonathanrobie on September 14, 2017 13:4
In the current design - with or without your amendments - document metadata lives under collections, not under documents, which represents the text of the document. I think that gives the clarity you are looking for.
I don't understand what you are saying about the cost of displaying properties. I doubt very much that servers will parse TEI at query time in order to return properties, metadata will generally be stored in some convenient queryable way before that. One strategy, of course, is to put it in an XML database.
I suspect this issue is now out of scope, since we are not doing search. Close it?
Agreed. We might reevaluate after the draft is out
From @jonathanrobie on September 9, 2017 21:21
Thibault's proposed amendments (https://github.com/distributed-text-services/distributed-text-services.github.io/wiki/Distributed-Text-Services-API-Proposal-Thibault-Amends) have a section called Document's Textual Search. The motivation is described thus:
We should discuss this in the meeting, but the motivation and design of this were not clear to me.
Copied from original issue: distributed-text-services/distributed-text-services.github.io#5