The Districtr reboot monorepo.
app
: The rebooted Districtr app, NextJS/React Typescript app.backend
: FastAPI/Python API.pipelines
: Data pipelines, ETL. Not a main focus of the reboot. For now, will mostly contain scratch data transformation scripts before being integrated into the backend CLI.prototypes
: Prototypes conducted as part of the reboot.The backend (Python), frontend (NextJS), and database (postgres) can be run locally using Docker.
docker-compose up --build
sample_data
in the repo root, and in docker-compose.yml
set services > backend > environment > LOAD_GERRY_DB_DATA
to true
. You can change where the script looks for available data with the GPKG_DATA_DIR
variable.After experimenting with various technologies (see prototypes
) we landed on the following architecture for the Districtr reboot:
The redesign aims to principally to address three key pain points in the Districtr application’s performance and maintainability:
And two key feature additions
The principal difference with the existing Districtr application is that the server is responsible for a lot more work in this architecture, with most metric calculations performed server-side. We discuss how centralizing/consolidating the backend offers a number of advantages for dealing with pain points listed above.
Compared to the existing Districtr application, the proposed architecture allows for GerryDB views to be loaded as tables into Districtr, and map tiles can be created downstream through this pipeline. This shifts the onus of the tiles as data store to a performant database and allows the tiles to specifically serve as the basis for map rendering and user interaction, providing a faster client-side experience.
Shared set-up / configuration across monorepo.
Dependencies are managed with uv. Follow their setup instructions here.
This project is formatted with ruff using pre-commit hooks. Make sure pre-commit and ruff are intalled then run pre-commit install
in the root directory.
Test that the pre-commit hooks are working by running pre-commit run --all-files
.
All PRs must have at least one approving review before being merged and pass all CI/CD checks / GHAs.
When reviewing a PR, use the "HIPPO" method to provide feedback: | Letter | Meaning |
---|---|---|
H - High / hold-up | Changes requested in order to be merged. | |
I - Important or improvement | Changes requested. Possibly blocking but more opinion-based than H. Reviewer should provide specifics as to why this is an improvement. | |
PP - Personal preference | Possible changes requested. Something the reviewer would do but is non-blocking. | |
O - Opinion | Comment for discussion. Non-blocking. Could be a bigger idea that's relevant to the PR. |
Open PRs will spin up a set of test apps for review, following the convention pr-<pr number>-districtr-districtr-v2-<sub app>
, and would be available for testing at e.g. https://pr-116-districtr-districtr-v2-app.fly.dev/map
. This behavior can be tweaks via .github/workflows/fly-deploy-pr.yml
Updates to PRs will trigger updates to staging apps, including re-running of migrations on the testing db.
Deployments are managed with GitHub Actions.