Update: On 20th October 2015, this proposal was adopted with 27 votes for, 1 abstention and none against.
During the voting process we also asked people what companies they admired and what was important to them in their developer journey. You can find the anonymised answers here: Voting for adoption of A-team proposal - Responses PDF (zooming required).
Founders & Coders (F&C) alumni have expressed a desire to continue their learning by freelancing after the course finishes but historically this has been problematic as there is no dedicated full time person/people to:
Given the lack of resources to bring on such a person or team
(and given no one in the space offered to take this on),
over the summer of 2015 it was proposed that F&C move to
just help alumni find external employment.
This was debated by the employment sub-group and it was decided
that this was also problematic and not in the best long term
interest of the school if it could be avoided (see #11).
An alternative solution is therefore required to these problems which will allow F&C students/alumni to continue learning (by doing) after the 16 week course while providing a sustainable income to fund the mission of F&C.
A proposal for setting up a commercial organisation, run by @iteles & @nelsonic to provide interesting and targeted project work (with oversight and mentorship) for F&C alumni. For more, see responsibilities.
The company will be developed fully open source and completely transparent creating a replicable model for making free learning sustainable.
Stipulations imposed by F&C employment group:
The aim is to create a way to simultaneously make F&C sustainable as a project, while still maintaining its replicability and providing alumni with a continued learning curve where they learn-by-doing while doing interesting and meaningful work after the 16 week course.
After the 16 week course, students have a number of options:
We believe all of these can co-exist.
This proposes that a commercial-focussed organisation is formed - run by @nelsonic and @iteles in the immediate term -
which will take on these last two, particularly concentrating on
finding and running development projects for F&C graduates.
For more on the reasons why this has come about, read the
'Why?' section above and for more on the
specific responsibilities of the organisation,
read the 'Responsibilities' section below.
Since we started dwyl,
we've had a
clear manifesto
that explains why we do what we do.
Worth highlighting here are:
Treating others the way you would like to be treated. In everything we do, we follow The Golden Rule
Open source. We want every aspect of our organisation to be open source, from the setup and the processes, questions raised and solutions found. We always make 'out in the open'. We hope this encourages everyone to contribute, ask and answer questions. We're aware this is "unconventional"; it's deliberate.
Full transparency. Transparent in our thought processes, in our decisions and in everything, right from the start.
Continuous learning. Good Great developers people
realize that in the pursuit of
mastery (in any field)
they can never stop learning.
This isn't just about learning code; being technically competent is
essential but no longer "enough".
It's about going along to client meetings and estimating tasks,
proposing projects and learning all the things you want to learn.
We do it for ourselves and we want to set up an environment that
provides opportunities for everyone to put in the time to do it too.
Keep it simple. Wherever possible, eliminate complexity.
Accountability for the work you do. We're here to help people do their best work for the project team they choose to be in.
People first, product second. We recommend watching Vineet Nayeer's short lecture on this subject if you haven't already. He's the former CEO of HCL Technologies, an extremely interesting organisation with a relatively flat organisational structure.
Ultimately we value helping everyone we come into contact with (and complete strangers who find us on the internet) learn and grow.
Admin
Inbound marketing
Calculations based on developers working 80% of the year (to provide a conservative estimate) suggest that at current cost levels (£2700 per month rounded up to £3000), F&C will receive enough income to break even as soon as there are 7 developers working on projects.
If people prefer to be placed directly with employers and this is done through the commercial organisation, there will be a commission going to F&C - the amount is to be agreed as part of the next steps.
Simple answer: Everything you need to be a top-rate freelancer or start your own company.
All developers will start on £120 per day (equates to £15 an hour for 8 hour days)
Commission for Founders & Coders does not come out of developers' day rate
Within 4 months, developers will undergo a peer led day rate review (for more on this, see issue #4)
Commission and structure for bringing in clients and projects will exist and is one of the things that needs to be researched in the coming month.
First, F&C people must vote on this proposal.
If it goes ahead, we would need to bring in 1 full time person at market rate for at least 1 month to help with:
This will provide a different point of view but crucially also allow @iteles and @nelsonic to start speaking to people and find work that is required in the immediate term.
Q: How will this affect F&C's responsibilities?
Q: What will the interaction be between this organisation and F&C?
Q: What if I find a piece of freelance work by myself? Do I need to bring it to this new company?
Q: What about if I find a piece of work and I need a team of developers from F&C? Do I have to bring it to this new company?
Q: What if a client wants me (as an individual) to do a piece of non-related work for them outside of F&C after I met them through an F&C freelance project?
There are 253 working days in a year; everyone should aim to take off at least 25 days holiday.
That leaves 228 working days.
So the initial annual income would be 228 days x £120 = £27,360,
however given the be peer-led rate reviews every 4 months
we expect rates to be
higher for people who stay for 4, 8 & 12 months.
We expect everyone to earn market rates.
Consider the following scenario: First let's divide the year into 3 equal parts; 76 days per "Tertile". Lets assume that a developer's peers deem them to be exceeding expectations both in technical ability and "delighting the customer" at each of the first two peer-feedback sessions.
This will mean:
We urge people not to focus on the cash amount. Especially since, if we succeed together (in delivering great project results) the peer-determined rates could be considerably more favorable.
But to give you an idea, IBM's Starting Salary for a graduate is £29,000 and they don't do anything resembling the kind of interesting & creative full-service/stack work we expect to be doing!
1We cannot guarantee developer income beyond the initial 4 month term. However provided the person shows proactivity we expect to have enough work for 10+ people for 12 months.