eProcurement-everis / ePO

2 stars 0 forks source link

Conceptual Model ready for revision and acceptance #28

Closed paulakeen closed 6 years ago

paulakeen commented 6 years ago

Dear OP

We have updated:

  1. The EAP Conceptual Data Model
  2. The XMI File
  3. The Wiki page with:

Please review and comment so we can update the WG Github before the 5th WGM.

muricna commented 6 years ago

Ok for updating but please: 1) reorder as agreed in our meeting with the first image being Procurement project. 2) I see no difference between CM-Visualisation and CM-Classes and properties. If there is no difference please keep only CM Visualisation, if there is a difference please let me know what it is. 3) The eap version of the overview shows an arrow from procurement project to technique is this an error because it does not appear in the image - please harmonise correctly.

sembu-eproc commented 6 years ago

Dear Natalie,

About your comment:

  1. As for what we discussed yesterday in the meeting, we thought that the order we mentioned (1. Procurement Project, 2. Overview, 3.procurement procedure) was only referring to the presentation for today. We think it makes no sense to have the overview in the second place, it can create confusion.

  2. "CM-Visualisation" is the main page, which includes "CM-Classes and properties" section. The only difference is that when clicking on "CM-Classes and properties" brings you to the specific section of the main page.

  3. We checked the eap version and the images and are the same. Can you please check it again? Thank you!

muricna commented 6 years ago

The web link to the eap is showing a 404 error - please correct. For point 1 ok for now For point 2 It is the same page just further down on the same page I do not the interest of doing this I think CM-Visualisation is enough For point 3 broken link see above

sembu-eproc commented 6 years ago

Dear Natalie,

Point 2: already applied in both private and public GH. Point 3: the broken link is already repaired.

sembu-eproc commented 6 years ago

Can this issue be closed?