Closed yvanlebras closed 5 years ago
Is it normal that we can have this: where an 4_eml-coverage/8_Taxonomic Classification Type/4_taxonomic Classification element is refering to its own 4_eml-coverage/8_Taxonomic Classification Type complexType element?
(Forgot to close the issue) This is perfectly normal, allowing recursive treatment of metadata, thus producing ramified information.
Is it normal that we can have this: where an 4_eml-coverage/8_Taxonomic Classification Type/4_taxonomic Classification element is refering to its own 4_eml-coverage/8_Taxonomic Classification Type complexType element?