Test improvements

[eliasnogueira]

Test improvements

This PR adds test improvements in the jnosql-communication-core module.

Added

• New Test Guideline

Changed

• Added pitest library and a new profile to run the analysis
• Changed the following for all test classes at the src/test/java:
  • class structure
  • addition of the @DisplayName annotation
  • added data-driven methods in some classes
  • using assertions from the AssertJ library instead of JUnit

Removed

• Removed the ValueTest class and the test methods were already being verified by the DefaultValueTest

Review before the merge

The following classes have //TODO comments and must be discussed before this PR can be merged.

ByteValueReaderTest

The test shouldConvert() is using the valueReader method that, previously, was using the Integer.class to verify the possible conversions, but it was causing a CastException. It was changed to Byte.class because it will return the converted value based on a byte value.

I believe the Byte is the correct class, but I need your guys input by

LocalDateTimeReaderTest

When the assertions were changed by the soft ones I had to change the parameters, as assertions methods are comparing always the actual vs expected. Before we had expected vs actual. Without the inversion, this test was throwing NullPointerExceptions

We need just a quick look at the shouldConvert() test to see if the actual objects make sense.

OffsetDateTimeReaderTest

The test shouldConvert() was using the OffSetDate class to read, but I believe the correct one should be the OffSetDateTime class, which also makes sense in the context of this test.

Can you guys double-check and see if the OffSetDateTime class is the correct one to use?

[genie-jnosql]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[otaviojava]

Amazing, there is a lot of improvement :)

[eliasnogueira]

@otaviojava what about the open questions in the PR description?

[otaviojava]

@eliasnogueira the PR is good enough, IMHO: let's merge it and open issues to solve on different PRs.

[otaviojava]

@eliasnogueira could you solve the pom.xml conflict?

[eliasnogueira]

@eliasnogueira could you solve the pom.xml conflict?

done :-)

[eliasnogueira]

@otaviojava I will go through the issues found during the build and adjust this PR