Open ecwood opened 1 year ago
To clarify the snippet above, we care about that because it uses a max-price
style constraint
. We are especially interested because it relates to negative emissions per the filename.
Consider adding, in each DAC period, this:
<input-tax name="DAC-ceiling">
...
</input-tax>
based on the files that Page Kyle sent.
We only want DAC to be deployed if it is under a specific cost. In
negative_emissions_budget_USA_gSSP2.xml
, there is a section like this:I am curious if those
constraint
values are due to the 7GtCO2 limitation from https://github.com/JGCRI/gcam-doc/blob/8fdb246cde30f04b6fc8ba507bdf30bab789f23a/demand_energy.md#direct-air-capture-for-carbon-dioxide-removal-1. I am also curious if we can edit these values to limit the cost per ton of DAC.This issue
https://github.com/JGCRI/gcam-core/issues/207
describes how DAC costs are implemented in GCAM.This is to implement #16, specifically described in this comment.