eisoch irg issues - Githubissues

eisoch / irg

irg

28 stars 1 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

T4-2D71 glyph for U+23CEB matches U+23D6D

#73 eisoch opened 4 years ago
0
Original V Codes in TCVN 5773 and TCVN 6056

#72 eisoch opened 4 years ago
0
Possible Horizontal Extensions for GHZR

#71 hfhchan opened 5 years ago
0
kTraditionalVariant and kSimplifiedVariant values related to Ext. G (incomplete)

#70 eisoch closed 5 years ago
1
Tables in sfnt and the additional tables

#69 eisoch opened 5 years ago
1
Possible Horizontal Extensions According to CJK_D and CJK_F (DRAFT)

#68 eisoch opened 5 years ago
0
Possible UK Horizontal Extension after IRG WS2017 Works

#67 eisoch opened 5 years ago
0
Possibly update some J glyphs in Unicode to follow IPA

#66 eisoch opened 5 years ago
3
KC-07223 and T4-2634

#65 eisoch opened 5 years ago
3
Possible Needful OpenType GSUB or GPOS Features

#64 eisoch opened 5 years ago
0
G glyphs update issues according to IRG WS dicussion

#63 eisoch opened 5 years ago
0
The ref. for U+2B089 should be updated

#62 eisoch closed 3 years ago
2
GKX-0432.20 glyph for U+39F7 (㧷) has not followed the PRC conventions

#61 eisoch opened 5 years ago
0
G3-6429 glyph for U+4200 (䈀) doesn't match the original source and the PRC conventions

#60 eisoch opened 5 years ago
0
0x9734BB36 glyph in GB 18030-2005 is incorrect

#59 eisoch opened 5 years ago
2
0x9630B034 glyph (𢤪) in GB 18030-2005 is incorrect

#58 eisoch opened 5 years ago
0
Atypical CJKUI collection

#57 eisoch opened 5 years ago
1
GZFY-00143 glyph for U+2C5EB (𬗫) is a misreading form

#56 eisoch opened 5 years ago
0
Possible DPRK horizontal extension

#55 eisoch opened 5 years ago
4
Possible Vietnamese horizontal extension in future based on Nom Na Tong

#54 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
Changes for Row 0xFEhh in GB/T 22321.1-2018

#53 eisoch opened 6 years ago
1
V4-483C glyph for U+2BEBC has not matched the evidence

#52 eisoch closed 4 years ago
0
V4-477E glyph for U+2BE4A has not matched the evidence

#51 eisoch closed 4 years ago
1
biodinfo mapping

#50 eisoch opened 6 years ago
1
Comments on CNS11643

#49 eisoch opened 6 years ago
1
GZFY-00972 glyph for U+2B4E6(𫓦) doesn't match the evidence

#48 eisoch opened 6 years ago
1
28,395 Moji Joho characters without JMJ references

#47 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
The GZFY-00398 glyph for U+2B37A doesn't match the source and hasn't followed the PRC conventions yet

#46 eisoch opened 6 years ago
1
The GZFY-00902 glyph for U+2B32D doesn't match the source, but the current one is correct form

#45 eisoch opened 6 years ago
3
U+2B2EA is an editorial error form

#44 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
U+2B150 is an editorial error form

#43 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
GZFY-00031 glyph for U+2AFF4 doesn't follow the PRC conventions

#42 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
Investigate origin of 䳥 (U+4CE5)

#41 hfhchan opened 6 years ago
3
Missing GKX references for multiple glyphs

#40 hfhchan closed 3 years ago
1
The G ref. for U+2AC5D (𪱝) should be removed

#39 eisoch opened 6 years ago
1
The G glyph for U+2B002 (𫀂) doesn't match the source

#38 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
The ref. for U+2B06F (𫁯) should be changed to UCI-nnnnn

#37 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
The G ref. for U+2AE6E (𪹮) should be removed

#36 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
The ref. for U+2A7F4 (𪟴) should be changed to UCI-nnnnn

#35 eisoch opened 6 years ago
1
0x9633FB33 (U+23ADB) glyph in GB 18030 should be modified to match PRC conventions

#34 eisoch opened 6 years ago
8
Add the second AJ1 glyph to U+4525(䔥)

#33 eisoch opened 6 years ago
1
0x8233A034 glyph in GB 18030 should be modified

#32 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
0x8231F738 glyph in GB 18030 should be modified

#31 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
U+35F4(㗴) & U+232BA(𣊺)

#30 eisoch closed 6 years ago
4
WS2017 Notes

#29 eisoch opened 6 years ago
2
Possible unification

#28 eisoch opened 6 years ago
91
Possible mapping changes for GB 18030

#27 eisoch closed 6 years ago
2
G3-327D glyph for 侴(U+4FB4) should be modified

#26 eisoch opened 6 years ago
4
GZFY-00813 glyph for U+2C9B9(𬦹) doesn't match the evidence

#25 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0
G0-5B4C glyph for U+53B6(厶) should be modified

#24 eisoch opened 6 years ago
0

Previous Next