Closed justmytwospence closed 8 years ago
That's probably the worst one, so yes I agree. It was meant to be for old, but it's a stretch. The issue with <
is that there's a v
and a V
, so what would the corresponding caps version be? I'm open to suggestions on this one. I tried C-o
for submodules but that wasn't working in the popup for some reason.
I'm happy to make changes, but I'm not sure your proposal is the right one.
Now that you give me the "old" mnemonic I could live with it. I'll keep thinking for alternatives though.
ok, like I said I don't like it, but that was the best I came up with
Using <
for revert would work if you can afford to lose quick access to the revert popup. Default magit is to have v
revert and V
for the revert popup, but I could make <
revert and h<
be the revert popup (main popup then revert key). Does that make sense?
and put the submodule key back, although I don't know the connection between o
and a submodule
@justmytwospence another option would be restoring v
for revert, keeping V
for linewise selection, and restoring o
for submodules?
Whats the rationale for using
o
for revert?o
is not really mnemonic for revert and because it is normally used for submodules, it forces us to rebind submodules to>
as well. I propose thato
be set back to submodules, and use something else for revert like<
, which is more evocative of revert than>
is for submodules (imho at least).