A Fiji plugin for the automated measurement of 3D morphological parameters of volumetric images of mitotic spindles.
You can download a set of example images via: Plugins > Spindle3D > Spindle3D Download Example Image
Spindle3D quantifies spindle and chromatin morphology in 2-colour confocal image stacks. It requires fluorescent labellings of microtubules (e.g. tubulin-GFP, anti-tubulin immunostainings, etc.) in one channel, and chromatin (e.g. histone-GFP, DAPI, etc.) in the other.
Please make sure to save a crop of your spindle of interest before the analysis. This will save computing time and prevent erroneous analysis. For cropping in Fiji, we recommend using the rectangular selection tool for drawing a region of interest around your spindle. Next copy your selection [Image > Duplicate > Duplicate stack] and save that copy.
Important: Spindle3D will abort the analysis if the objects (chromatin or spindle) are in direct contact with any of the image borders (also see 'Troubleshooting').
Please make sure that your input image is calibrated, i.e. the xy-length of your voxels and the z-step size are annotated in your image metadata. In Fiji, you can verify this in [Image > Properties].
No other preprocessing is required.
Optional: Cell volume mask Spindle3D will look for an additional file called [Name of input image] + ”_CellMask.tif” in the same folder as the input image. The binary image should contain the mask of the cell in question and should have the same dimensions and calibration as the input image. If provided, only the voxels within the cell mask will be used for the analysis.
Disclaimer: As spindle and chromatin morphology can be very variable in different systems, we cannot guarantee that our analysis works for every spindle type or data set. Please feel encouraged to share your experiences with us! Spindles tested so far: HeLa Kyoto, HEK293, mouse embryonic stem cells, Ptk2, Bovine 1-cell and 2-cell embryos, mouse oocytes, Xenopus laevis egg extract
We recommend verifying your analysis using the Spindle3D output images (see section "Output images").
To cite this plugin and for a detailed documentation of the image analysis procedures, please use the following publication:
Tobias Kletter, Sebastian Reusch, Nils Dempewolf, Christian Tischer and Simone Reber. "Volumetric morphometry reveals spindle width as the best predictor of mammalian spindle scaling." Journal of Cell Biology (2021). DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202106170.
Each analysis will generate an output table with the following morphometric measurements.
Volume of the cell mask, if provided (see “Requirements for input image”).
Surface area of the cell mask, if provided (see “Requirements for input image”).
Measure of a central opening within the metaphase plate.
Volume of the segmented chromatin signal.
Threshold value that was applied for the volumetric segmentation of the chromatin.
Average diameter of the metaphase plate.
Average thickness of the metaphase plate along the direction of the spindle axis.
Tilt angle between the spindle axis and the xy plane of the original coordinate system.
Ratio between spindle length and width.
The distance between the center of the segmented chromatin and the center of the segmented spindle.
Coefficient of variation of the gray values within the spindle mask.
Spindle pole-to-pole distance.
The signal-to-noise ratio between the average spindle tubulin signal and the outside tubulin signal
Volume of the segmented tubulin signal.
Average width of the segmented spindle (perpendicular to the spindle axis).
Maximum width of the segmented spindle.
Minimum width of the segmented spindle.
Mean voxel gray value within the cell mask, if a cell mask was provided (see “Requirements for input image”). Note: This is the raw, non-background corrected value!
Mean voxel gray value within the spindle mask. Note: This is the raw, non-background corrected value!
Threshold applied for the volumetric segmentation of the spindle.
You can open your input image and start the analysis via:
Alternatively, you can specify the location of your input image and start the analysis via:
Batch processing
This is the standard execution of the morphometric analysis.
The advanced version provides additional and optional settings. Currently, the advanced version is only available upon request! Please contact us if you wish to test the advanced version on your dataset.
The overall analysis workflow will be the same as in the standard plugin.
Z montage of Spindle3D output images. HeLa Kyoto spindle, tubulin-GFP (green), SiR-DNA (blue), spindle center and poles (white). Scale bar: 10 µm.
Z montage of Spindle3D binary masks output (2). HeLa Kyoto spindle, spindle mask (green), chromatin mask (blue), spindle center and poles (white). Scale bar: 10 µm.
If the automated analysis fails to correctly locate the spindle poles and/or direction of the spindle axis, this can have multiple causes. Spindle3D expects the chromatin plate to be round and disc-shaped, and the direction of the shortest chromatin axis initially sets the direction of the spindle axis. Thus, if the chromatin shape in your input image is e.g. squashed, Spindle3D will run into problems.
If the error is not grave, you can however adjust the analysis to locate the spindle poles better. To do so, in the Spindle3D advanced mode, experiment with your pole refinement search radii. This will decrease or increase the space in which Spindle3D looks for the poles.
If there are too many bright objects in close proximity to your spindle and mitotic chromatin, the analysis might run into errors and abort, or it fails to properly separate the objects.
In crowded environments such as these, automated analysis via Spindle3D might fail. (Tubulin (green), Hoechst (gray), scale bar: 10 µm.)
To overcome this challenge, we recommend providing a binary cell mask along with your spindle input image. You can create these manually (e.g. using the volume manager in the SCF MPI-CBG Fiji package) or e.g. using the segmentation tool Ilastik (Berg et al., 2019). Next, simply drop the file containing the cell mask ([Name of input image] + ”_CellMask.tif”) in the same folder as your input image and Spindle3D will exclude all pixels that are not within the cell mask from the analysis.
Another reason for failing analyses might be, that your spindle and/or chromatin are touching any of the image borders. To make the morphometric measurements meaningful, please make sure to image and crop your spindles in a way that their three-dimensional extents are fully covered. One way to verify this is to check the orthogonal views [Image > Stacks > Orthogonal Views].
In the examples below, all image borders are highlighted with dashed orange lines:
In (A) the analysis will fail because the object is directly in contact with the image border, that is the "floor" and the "ceiling" of the image. Please note that this is an extreme example, and that much more subtle contacts could cause the analysis to abort! In (B) the entire depth of the object is covered in all directions (XYZ) with extra space to spare.