Closed fehrhart closed 8 years ago
I am doubtful about the zirconium oxide and zirconium dioxide nanoparticles as being separate entities. 'Zirconium oxide', 'zirconium dioxide', 'zirconia', and 'zirconic anhydride' are all widely used synonyms for ZrO2
I checked the material source in the primary literature (Sigma Aldrich # 643025), that is indeed ZrO2 although they keep calling it Zirconium oxide...
I have corrected my patch in the NPO (along with creating a 'devel' branch): https://github.com/sobolevnrm/npo/commit/77d34c12562f61ec871adc56cf9be2169b86e81e
Let's start make patches for the remaining nanoparticles in this branch?
done
These items are not yet covered by any ontology: copper nanoparticle zirconium dioxide nanoparticle fullerenol nanoparticle polyethylenglycol nanoparticle germanium nanoparticle molybdenum trioxide nanoparticle aluminum nanoparticle cadmium(II) oxide nanoparticle Manganese (IV) dioxide nanoparticle tungsten nanoparticle tricalcium phosphate nanoparticle
Some details and information (sheet 3):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CeAjmJFqjrLD14GNphjaCSUlaTaSwHfV91MA4e5oi4M/edit?usp=sharing