Closed egonw closed 7 years ago
AFAIK carbon black
is not necessary nanoparticle
In that paper it is sized 14 nm, according to a Visby data set submission by Penny ;)
I'm now annotating it as "nanoparticle" because also a general "carbon nanoparticle" type does not exist in the ontology.
carbon black is not necessary a nanoparticle, his suggestion is to add a carbon black nanoparticle to a sub-class of carbon black.
Or go all the way how NPO models it... which has "titanium dioxide" and "titanium dioxide nanoparticle" and uses an OWL axiom to link the second to the first...
ChEBI now has carbon black nanoparticle (CHEBI:133602) which is classified as a) is_a carbon black (CHEBI:82297) b) is_a carbon nanostructure (CHEBI:50812) c) is_a nanoparticle (CHEBI:50803)
has been added. 7f67a5839f3da40bddc9d8cdf6f5cb09e90cfb41
There does not seem to be a term for carbon black nanoparticles yet. Like in http://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-8977-11-4
ChEBI has "carbon black" but I am not sure at this moment if that is in the right place in the ontology (given NPO has "metal oxide" and "metal oxide nanoparticle") and this term may not be (ontologically) the same as "carbon black nanoparticle"... (and no time to check immediately right now).