Open eriqande opened 2 years ago
This would definitely be the way to do this, I think. And then we could have some other sections for each
one that defined the MAFs that we wanted, and other things. (Those could be defined as lists). Then we could expand
those into the appropriate paths in a rule all
.
I am not going to get moving on this until I have finished up the Yukon association study (quick and dirty). But once that is done, I am going to prioritize cleaning this up.
It would go something like this:
I think that would be a lot easier to look at and modify, etc.