The primary question is specified : " How does the RSPCA manage animal outcomes across Australia?" and several secondary questions are introduced in this section.
Data description
By using the table format to describe clearly about data structure and details, data source has been added in this part as well. In addition, updated the limitation of each data and make them more reasonable and specific. For example: animal complaints data only focus on Queensland instead of Australia with general perspective or the number for the animals outcome might be effected by the different legislation governing the animal welfare.
Original Question
Combined with Q1-Q3 as one question to talk about good outcomes for animals in Australia, and separated Q4 into each single question and rewrite all the content as well for the all original question by adding more analysis and supportive reference.
New question
Q1: Except for only analysing the good outcomes for animals in Australia, the further question is established by exploring the relationship between the type of animal and its outcome which can capture the relationship between all outcomes and animal type.
Q2: Instead of focus on the total number of complaints between cats and dogs, the more interesting question is explored about the type of complaints which may have higher probability to happened between dogs and cats. And the new question is extended the scope of original analysis which only compare two total number in complaints.
Conclusion
Rewrite the conclusion which is more related to the above analysis rather than talking about irrelevant topic such as what else RSPCA can do for protecting the animals in the original report.
Introduction
The primary question is specified : " How does the RSPCA manage animal outcomes across Australia?" and several secondary questions are introduced in this section.
Data description
By using the table format to describe clearly about data structure and details, data source has been added in this part as well. In addition, updated the limitation of each data and make them more reasonable and specific. For example: animal complaints data only focus on Queensland instead of Australia with general perspective or the number for the animals outcome might be effected by the different legislation governing the animal welfare.
Original Question
Combined with Q1-Q3 as one question to talk about good outcomes for animals in Australia, and separated Q4 into each single question and rewrite all the content as well for the all original question by adding more analysis and supportive reference.
New question
Q1: Except for only analysing the good outcomes for animals in Australia, the further question is established by exploring the relationship between the type of animal and its outcome which can capture the relationship between all outcomes and animal type.
Q2: Instead of focus on the total number of complaints between cats and dogs, the more interesting question is explored about the type of complaints which may have higher probability to happened between dogs and cats. And the new question is extended the scope of original analysis which only compare two total number in complaints.
Conclusion
Rewrite the conclusion which is more related to the above analysis rather than talking about irrelevant topic such as what else RSPCA can do for protecting the animals in the original report.