Closed wiktorhejchman closed 2 years ago
done on my side
> clique.getSnapshot()
{
hash: "0xbe5fcb9a62feaf8a78400f4672710b3db8c28776f7e36c625449c41196b5f955",
number: 149893,
recents: {
149891: "0xec3f218d9876bfc01e9a4601575fe60f1b2c8f76",
149892: "0x1311aef86d1db33db945fc488eeff1c6105b9593",
149893: "0x6e45c195e12d7fe5e02059f15d59c2c976a9b730"
},
signers: {
0x1311aef86d1db33db945fc488eeff1c6105b9593: {},
0x6e45c195e12d7fe5e02059f15d59c2c976a9b730: {},
0xc16c63da5f6e464148ffc0bcef9e761a16af6004: {},
0xec3f218d9876bfc01e9a4601575fe60f1b2c8f76: {}
},
tally: {
0x27946dc14f6f3d30f6fbc98fd8b0a23918fc3044: {
authorize: true,
votes: 1
},
0x63c08d9acd74dac8b80b9b49e4b7ad5936031ff7: {
authorize: true,
votes: 1
}
},
votes: [{
address: "0x27946dc14f6f3d30f6fbc98fd8b0a23918fc3044",
authorize: true,
block: 149889,
signer: "0x6e45c195e12d7fe5e02059f15d59c2c976a9b730"
}, {
address: "0x63c08d9acd74dac8b80b9b49e4b7ad5936031ff7",
authorize: true,
block: 149893,
signer: "0x6e45c195e12d7fe5e02059f15d59c2c976a9b730"
}]
}
>
@peache41 can you authorize SEB sealers from your side please?
Done for me
First time I'm doing it. I think it is done:
> clique.getSnapshot()
{
hash: "0xe11e6d4bd64a69c318deb004abf29b65335e8de438d92ae79a8e650c0542bfed",
number: 151934,
recents: {
151931: "0xec3f218d9876bfc01e9a4601575fe60f1b2c8f76",
151932: "0x1311aef86d1db33db945fc488eeff1c6105b9593",
151933: "0x27946dc14f6f3d30f6fbc98fd8b0a23918fc3044",
151934: "0x63c08d9acd74dac8b80b9b49e4b7ad5936031ff7"
},
signers: {
0x1311aef86d1db33db945fc488eeff1c6105b9593: {},
0x27946dc14f6f3d30f6fbc98fd8b0a23918fc3044: {},
0x63c08d9acd74dac8b80b9b49e4b7ad5936031ff7: {},
0x6e45c195e12d7fe5e02059f15d59c2c976a9b730: {},
0xc16c63da5f6e464148ffc0bcef9e761a16af6004: {},
0xec3f218d9876bfc01e9a4601575fe60f1b2c8f76: {}
},
tally: {},
votes: []
Thanks all, do we need to be audited again with footprint to sign properly?
Not really to sign the blocks but to earn crypto yes you should
That's exactly what I meant, thanks
I had enough crypto on the auditor account to audit ine node
The second one needs more crypto that I need to get from another account
Would you sell some ? 😂😂😎
@guenoledc @wiktorhejchman sent 5000 CRC to the auditor account so we should have enough to audit the other nodes, but SEB sealers seems down
> clique.status()
{
inturnPercent: 35.9375,
numBlocks: 64,
sealerActivity: {
0x1311aef86d1db33db945fc488eeff1c6105b9593: 16,
0x27946dc14f6f3d30f6fbc98fd8b0a23918fc3044: 0,
0x63c08d9acd74dac8b80b9b49e4b7ad5936031ff7: 0,
0x6e45c195e12d7fe5e02059f15d59c2c976a9b730: 16,
0xc16c63da5f6e464148ffc0bcef9e761a16af6004: 16,
0xec3f218d9876bfc01e9a4601575fe60f1b2c8f76: 16
}
}
>
SEB sealers back online
SEB sealers seams to be down again
Yes @guenoledc, they are still in Sandbox and all the VMs are stopping regularly, maybe since we are well over sandbox project budget, it started when we passed it. We are moving to dev asap so that should be no problem. Restarted them now.
Hi all,
please add SEB sealers to the network: