It is apparent from the end of the CDC #13 the SHA3 ECIP-1049/1095 and accompanied mining algo change discussions are eating up too much bandwidth. The focus needs to remain on 51% attack solutions to stablize this network. So, I request to move ECIP-1093 to Withdrawn status to clear it from discussion.
Withdrawn - ECIP authors may decide to change the status between Draft, Deferred, or Withdrawn. The ECIP editor may also change the status to Deferred if no progress is being made on the ECIP. Source: https://github.com/ethereumclassic/ECIPs
Due to the observation that there is already a vocal opposition to changing the mining algorithm away from GPU-friendly Ethash. I believe any proposal suggesting a mining algo change would be contenious (ECIP-1049, ECIP-1093, ECIP-1095) and is against the ECIP process goals of avoiding network splits.
It is apparent from the end of the CDC #13 the
SHA3ECIP-1049/1095 and accompanied mining algo change discussions are eating up too much bandwidth. The focus needs to remain on 51% attack solutions to stablize this network. So, I request to move ECIP-1093 toWithdrawnstatus to clear it from discussion.Withdrawn- ECIP authors may decide to change the status between Draft, Deferred, or Withdrawn. The ECIP editor may also change the status to Deferred if no progress is being made on the ECIP. Source: https://github.com/ethereumclassic/ECIPsDue to the observation that there is already a vocal opposition to changing the mining algorithm away from GPU-friendly Ethash. I believe any proposal suggesting a mining algo change would be contenious (ECIP-1049, ECIP-1093, ECIP-1095) and is against the ECIP process goals of avoiding network splits.
File Changes:
Thanks, r0n1n