Closed mjn33 closed 9 years ago
The right way to show Cl and Cd would really be for all parts to make use of the reference value in the FlightData window. It would make everything fully and completely consistent.
Shouldn't wing pieces be treated on a per-part basis though? For example, if the reference value in the flight data window is used for wing pieces, a wing made from a single piece would be tinted more than an identical wing made from two pieces.
...true.
Ah, I guess then that leaving things using exposedArea should be fine. Mostly just thinking about ways to try and get comparable lift coefficients between wings and fuselages, but that's a little difficult to manage. Using exposedArea should be fine for now, I think.
Yeah, now thinking on it a bit more, this problem would exist for non-wing parts as well. E.g. a fuselage made from many short Mk3 fuselage parts vs a fuselage made from fewer long Mk3 fuselage parts.
Cheers for merging in any case though!
This patch reimplements the old aero visualization options introduced in FAR 0.14.2.
There are a few things I should mention though:
Any changes/bugfixes you want made to this just let me know, and I'll push them to this PR.