Closed oushujun closed 1 year ago
Hi @oushujun,
I think all the tooling should work fine with the Nanopore bams by skipping the predict step as you suggest. I know at least one person using ft add-nucleosomes
with nanopore.
But let me know if you run into any issues, and I will be happy to address them if you can provide example data.
Cheers, Mitchell
Thank you for the immediate response! Is this the right place to ask about the fiberseq m6A-MTase chemistry? I would like to obtain the currently most adaptative m6A-MTase and apply it in plants.
Thanks! Shujun
For that you should reach out to Andrew Stergachis (my PI) to see if you can get an MTA setup for the Hia5 enzyme. absterga@uw.edu
We are working on a protocol paper that covers both the wet and dry aspects of fiberseq but it's not ready yet...
Cheers, Mitchell
Thank you Mitchell!
Shujun
Hello,
Thank you for developing fiber-seq and fiber-tools! I am new to this field. It seems that you can use the m6A-MTase treated gDNA to prepare Nanopore libraries and sequence with Nanopore, and there are many tools available to accurately call m6A in Nanopore data. My question: can Fibertools be used to process Nanopore-called m6A information by skipping the
ft-predict-m6a
step?Thanks! Shujun