Closed ribasushi closed 1 year ago
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:
A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.
5PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
500TiB
**Multisig created and sent to RKH f01782465
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
250TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecyh4pipo7knyjapvmuv2efevkxdiaeyxcpbynebeefk4m3b7pelm
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
250.00TiB
Signer Address
f1wxhnytjmklj2czezaqcfl7eb4nkgmaxysnegwii
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecyh4pipo7knyjapvmuv2efevkxdiaeyxcpbynebeefk4m3b7pelm
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacebxiwvyypue5usad77am77omczjxnlfsvuc3dvyq5vamjsar7zjmk
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
250.00TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebxiwvyypue5usad77am77omczjxnlfsvuc3dvyq5vamjsar7zjmk
confirming that transaction seems to have gone through. removing warning.
Greetings folks. I was originally allocated 250TiB, I am now down to about ~30. The refresh was supposed to kick in by now...
hmm looks like subsequent allocation bot is not making the rounds on this one... @fabriziogianni7, logs are showing no activity last 5 days.
Alright, going to request this manually so the automated dealmaker does not stop. Will take a pass on some of the other open LDNs as well until the SSA bot is back up and running (cc @galen-mcandrew @Kevin-FF-USA @fabriziogianni7 for FYI).
For notaries, dashboard shows 45TiB DataCap left, ~6700 deals, with the following SP distribution: https://filplus.d.interplanetary.one/clients/f01787692/breakdown
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
500TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedjlvxslb53f4viwdnvpfp2qir635t4aapysljpwmeap46kqbmuxs
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedjlvxslb53f4viwdnvpfp2qir635t4aapysljpwmeap46kqbmuxs
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacec2dpsu4injlghjndb2f7tndwhtvaej33uc2e4qij2wflxnzsfw26
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec2dpsu4injlghjndb2f7tndwhtvaej33uc2e4qij2wflxnzsfw26
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceauslqnnb7im77e6s7l2bspxcupad7eitijs5azzc7j3tnykjdcwq
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceauslqnnb7im77e6s7l2bspxcupad7eitijs5azzc7j3tnykjdcwq
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedcixx7odjuiyp2mtz7g7lcat5pihrs6fsp3kfl3cgh2527j6hvq2
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedcixx7odjuiyp2mtz7g7lcat5pihrs6fsp3kfl3cgh2527j6hvq2
We got 4 proposals instead of 1 proposal and 1 approval. this might be because the StartSignDatacap label did not come up on its own. @fabriziogianni7 do you know if this is accurate? I'm manually adding the label now.
app now shows proposal from @flyworker. @MegTei if you are around, can you try signing that particular one again?
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacece4iqpw7vzgw6gqq42esf4c24alnpvshewnjeam2jlu445lfv3dk
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacece4iqpw7vzgw6gqq42esf4c24alnpvshewnjeam2jlu445lfv3dk
This went through. Changing state to granted.
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
1000.0TiB
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
not found & not found
200% of weekly dc amount requested
1000.0TiB
250TiB
4.75PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
21122 | 25 | 500TiB | 30.01 | 110.06TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedsbxpzws67gmnwe33x6dqtrnwx4tpwxmi7tqlv3g223e4tl7qlj2
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedsbxpzws67gmnwe33x6dqtrnwx4tpwxmi7tqlv3g223e4tl7qlj2
allocation approved by @s0nik42 with msCId bafy2bzacebnmnn2qrv6cpdqig5hzas4euvrofeihlhgyud36tmjjtqbdorfeg
https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebnmnn2qrv6cpdqig5hzas4euvrofeihlhgyud36tmjjtqbdorfeg
this went through for txId 2 for 500TiB still txID 3 and 4 for 500TiB pending @dkkapur @galen-mcandrew, trying to simulate another request here with the approval from @flyworker.
after approving this we will have stil one proposal with tx ID 4 from meg.
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
500TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceauslqnnb7im77e6s7l2bspxcupad7eitijs5azzc7j3tnykjdcwq
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceauslqnnb7im77e6s7l2bspxcupad7eitijs5azzc7j3tnykjdcwq
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedzvg5u7j6potaum4hu327j42m2bvb3utfrabxhfbqwlvuobck35i
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1yh6q3nmsg7i2sys7f7dexcuajgoweudcqj2chfi
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedzvg5u7j6potaum4hu327j42m2bvb3utfrabxhfbqwlvuobck35i
@fabriziogianni7 Great!
@galen-mcandrew @dkkapur this is the only proposal left (500TiB) How do we want to proceed here? https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedcixx7odjuiyp2mtz7g7lcat5pihrs6fsp3kfl3cgh2527j6hvq2 I suggest: trigger this now the same way as the previous allocation and discount 500TiB from the next one who will be triggered by the bot
@fabriziogianni7 I actually see 2 open proposals. the second one is at 1000 TiB (tx ID 5). Is there a way to just set it up for that to be approved since that's the second one that is needed? https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedsbxpzws67gmnwe33x6dqtrnwx4tpwxmi7tqlv3g223e4tl7qlj2
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
500TiB
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedcixx7odjuiyp2mtz7g7lcat5pihrs6fsp3kfl3cgh2527j6hvq2
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedcixx7odjuiyp2mtz7g7lcat5pihrs6fsp3kfl3cgh2527j6hvq2
when this get allocated, we can trigger another request to match this proposal
ACK makes sense. So in this case, client will not get the max DataCap they are eligible for per tranche, but we can release substantial tranches that comply with the guidelines nonetheless, and speed up additional tranches to compensate if needed. Thanks @fabriziogianni7 cc @ribasushi
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaczvmy5b66ievqdomhvsfyi3kez46bz6lhushwksafdx5mf42fvg
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1fkxkfxgopjf3ufnfg5i3m6qlwf73kp4w5zz7nnq
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaczvmy5b66ievqdomhvsfyi3kez46bz6lhushwksafdx5mf42fvg
@dkkapur @fabriziogianni7 we are under 200 - please trigger txid 5
soon.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacedsbxpzws67gmnwe33x6dqtrnwx4tpwxmi7tqlv3g223e4tl7qlj2
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
1000.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedsbxpzws67gmnwe33x6dqtrnwx4tpwxmi7tqlv3g223e4tl7qlj2
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzaceda5e3mahtedhdzlgdy6cjy5wk5ng4djqg243zim66k54oh7czlq6
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1ystxl2ootvpirpa7ebgwl7vlhwkbx2r4zjxwe5i
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceda5e3mahtedhdzlgdy6cjy5wk5ng4djqg243zim66k54oh7czlq6
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaz4tzfedyk7fpgczbpj7ptzx2kv3bd57nmzvwov2scrvok3gylte
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1hlubjsdkv4wmsdadihloxgwrz3j3ernf6i3cbpy
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaz4tzfedyk7fpgczbpj7ptzx2kv3bd57nmzvwov2scrvok3gylte
Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, US | 511.13 TiB | 16.81% | 505.25 TiB | 1.15% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BE | 364.71 TiB | 11.99% | 364.71 TiB | 0.00% |
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, US | 319.87 TiB | 10.52% | 296.03 TiB | 7.45% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, US | 253.02 TiB | 8.32% | 253.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NL | 226.65 TiB | 7.45% | 226.65 TiB | 0.00% |
f01851231 | Seattle, Washington, US | 202.67 TiB | 6.66% | 202.67 TiB | 0.00% |
f0440429 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 158.14 TiB | 5.20% | 157.69 TiB | 0.29% |
f01611097 | San Clemente, California, US | 127.17 TiB | 4.18% | 125.58 TiB | 1.25% |
f01784458 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 108.85 TiB | 3.58% | 108.85 TiB | 0.00% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 86.51 TiB | 2.84% | 86.51 TiB | 0.00% |
f01826669 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US | 79.95 TiB | 2.63% | 79.95 TiB | 0.00% |
f01806491 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 75.09 TiB | 2.47% | 75.09 TiB | 0.00% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 63.96 TiB | 2.10% | 63.83 TiB | 0.20% |
f08403 | Bourton on the Water, England, GB | 59.12 TiB | 1.94% | 59.12 TiB | 0.00% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CA | 55.25 TiB | 1.82% | 55.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 52.84 TiB | 1.74% | 52.84 TiB | 0.00% |
f01847751 | Denver, Colorado, US | 49.90 TiB | 1.64% | 49.90 TiB | 0.00% |
f024184 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 37.94 TiB | 1.25% | 37.88 TiB | 0.16% |
f01801091 | Canton, Ohio, US | 30.34 TiB | 1.00% | 30.34 TiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 28.33 TiB | 0.93% | 28.33 TiB | 0.00% |
f0707721 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 26.27 TiB | 0.86% | 26.27 TiB | 0.00% |
f02576 | Copenhagen, Capital Region, DK | 24.36 TiB | 0.80% | 24.36 TiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, US | 16.02 TiB | 0.53% | 16.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838684 | Prague, Hlavní město Praha, CZ | 12.58 TiB | 0.41% | 12.58 TiB | 0.00% |
f01278 | Grand Rapids, Michigan, US | 12.50 TiB | 0.41% | 12.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01840390 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 11.17 TiB | 0.37% | 11.17 TiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, US | 9.59 TiB | 0.32% | 9.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f019551 | Birmingham, England, GB | 6.25 TiB | 0.21% | 6.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01883179 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US | 4.63 TiB | 0.15% | 4.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f01423116 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 4.60 TiB | 0.15% | 4.60 TiB | 0.00% |
f01790264 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 4.23 TiB | 0.14% | 4.23 TiB | 0.00% |
f01872811new |
Dallas, Texas, US | 2.54 TiB | 0.08% | 2.54 TiB | 0.00% |
f01853438new |
Beijing, Beijing, CN | 2.17 TiB | 0.07% | 2.17 TiB | 0.00% |
f01466075 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 2.13 TiB | 0.07% | 2.13 TiB | 0.00% |
f01771403 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.98 TiB | 0.07% | 1.98 TiB | 0.00% |
f0142637 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CN | 1.66 TiB | 0.05% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01764587 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.50 TiB | 0.05% | 1.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL | 1.27 TiB | 0.04% | 1.27 TiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KR | 1.03 TiB | 0.03% | 1.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RU | 912.00 GiB | 0.03% | 912.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f097777 | Kivertsi, Volyn, UA | 608.00 GiB | 0.02% | 608.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01699939 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KR | 604.50 GiB | 0.02% | 604.50 GiB | 0.00% |
f010202 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK | 480.00 GiB | 0.02% | 480.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0104671 | Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JP | 386.00 GiB | 0.01% | 386.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01310564 | Oslo, Oslo, NO | 144.00 GiB | 0.00% | 144.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01747176new |
Beijing, Beijing, CN | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f010446 | Zaventem, Flanders, BE | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 44.70% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
127.84 TiB | 128.00 TiB | 1 | 4.21% |
376.44 TiB | 776.91 TiB | 2 | 25.55% |
149.88 TiB | 454.38 TiB | 3 | 14.94% |
121.63 TiB | 488.00 TiB | 4 | 16.05% |
70.06 TiB | 350.65 TiB | 5 | 11.53% |
55.17 TiB | 331.56 TiB | 6 | 10.90% |
39.06 TiB | 273.82 TiB | 7 | 9.00% |
17.65 TiB | 141.42 TiB | 8 | 4.65% |
7.88 TiB | 70.93 TiB | 9 | 2.33% |
2.44 TiB | 24.38 TiB | 10 | 0.80% |
96.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 11 | 0.03% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
2.31PiB
aeca55c3-95fe-4ccb-b7bc-563111345923
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
flyworker & megtei
800% of weekly dc amount requested
2.31PiB
2.68PiB
2.31PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
126476 | 48 | 500TiB | 16.22 | 124.09TiB |
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceblzl7gysugiv3uhnxcjsdsaf73ybmnlbwquyfvcqkyhvdfnfwdte
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
aeca55c3-95fe-4ccb-b7bc-563111345923
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceblzl7gysugiv3uhnxcjsdsaf73ybmnlbwquyfvcqkyhvdfnfwdte
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
4.55TiB
3078a39b-e0b5-478e-bdb9-ca6d6658b9ea
f01782465
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
cryptowhizzard & flyworker
800% of weekly dc amount requested
4.55TiB
2.68PiB
2.31PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
127026 | 48 | 2.31PiB | 16.14 | 110.25TiB |
Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
3
cryptowhizzard3
fabriziogianni73
flyworker1
jimcray3
MegTei1
s0nik421
swatchliu1
TimWilliams00
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01423116 | Oslo, Oslo, NOAltibox AS |
4.60 TiB | 0.15% | 4.60 TiB | 0.00% |
f01310564 | Sandefjord, Vestfold og Telemark, NOAremark EDB AS |
440.00 GiB | 0.01% | 440.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01611097 | San Juan Capistrano, California, USAT&T Services, Inc. |
127.17 TiB | 4.07% | 125.58 TiB | 1.25% |
f01278 | Grand Rapids, Michigan, USAT&T Services, Inc. |
14.00 TiB | 0.45% | 14.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f08403 | Bourton on the Water, England, GBBritish Telecommunications PLC |
59.21 TiB | 1.89% | 59.21 TiB | 0.00% |
f01801091 | Canton, Ohio, USCharter Communications Inc |
30.34 TiB | 0.97% | 30.34 TiB | 0.00% |
f01853438new |
Beijing, Beijing, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone |
2.17 TiB | 0.07% | 2.17 TiB | 0.00% |
f01747176new |
Beijing, Beijing, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone |
96.00 GiB | 0.00% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0142637 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
1.66 TiB | 0.05% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BECogent Communications |
364.71 TiB | 11.66% | 364.71 TiB | 0.00% |
f01826669 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USCogent Communications |
79.95 TiB | 2.56% | 79.95 TiB | 0.00% |
f01883179 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USCogent Communications |
4.63 TiB | 0.15% | 4.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f010446 | Zaventem, Flanders, BECogent Communications |
32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Manchester, New Hampshire, USComcast Cable Communications, LLC |
16.02 TiB | 0.51% | 16.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01392893 | Nederweert, Limburg, NLFusix Networks B.V. |
226.65 TiB | 7.25% | 226.65 TiB | 0.00% |
f010202 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHK Broadband Network Ltd. |
480.00 GiB | 0.01% | 480.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | San Jose, California, USHurricane Electric LLC |
9.59 TiB | 0.31% | 9.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f0104671 | Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JPKDDI CORPORATION |
386.00 GiB | 0.01% | 386.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01840390 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
11.17 TiB | 0.36% | 11.17 TiB | 0.00% |
f01790264 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
4.23 TiB | 0.14% | 4.23 TiB | 0.00% |
f01466075 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
2.13 TiB | 0.07% | 2.13 TiB | 0.00% |
f01764587 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
1.50 TiB | 0.05% | 1.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
1.03 TiB | 0.03% | 1.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01699939 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KRKorea Telecom |
604.50 GiB | 0.02% | 604.50 GiB | 0.00% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, USKrypt Technologies |
281.36 TiB | 9.00% | 281.36 TiB | 0.00% |
f01847751 | San Jose, California, USLevel 3 Parent, LLC |
49.90 TiB | 1.60% | 49.90 TiB | 0.00% |
f01872811new |
Dallas, Texas, USLevel 3 Parent, LLC |
2.54 TiB | 0.08% | 2.54 TiB | 0.00% |
f0440429 | Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
169.61 TiB | 5.42% | 169.15 TiB | 0.27% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
102.04 TiB | 3.26% | 102.04 TiB | 0.00% |
f01806491 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
82.51 TiB | 2.64% | 82.50 TiB | 0.02% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
66.31 TiB | 2.12% | 66.28 TiB | 0.05% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
63.96 TiB | 2.05% | 63.83 TiB | 0.20% |
f024184 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
37.94 TiB | 1.21% | 37.88 TiB | 0.16% |
f097777 | Kivertsi, Volyn, UALink Telecom Service Ltd |
608.00 GiB | 0.02% | 608.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019551 | Birmingham, England, GBNeonix Web Services Limited |
6.25 TiB | 0.20% | 6.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, USNew Dream Network, LLC |
511.13 TiB | 16.34% | 505.25 TiB | 1.15% |
f01784458 | Oslo, Oslo, NONexthop AS |
108.85 TiB | 3.48% | 108.85 TiB | 0.00% |
f01163272 | Perm, Perm Krai, RUPJSC Rostelecom |
912.00 GiB | 0.03% | 912.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02576 | Copenhagen, Capital Region, DKTelenor A/S |
30.96 TiB | 0.99% | 30.96 TiB | 0.00% |
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, USWholesail networks LLC |
319.87 TiB | 10.23% | 296.03 TiB | 7.45% |
f01851231 | Seattle, Washington, USWholesail networks LLC |
202.67 TiB | 6.48% | 202.67 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838684 | Prague, Hlavní město Praha, CZWIA spol. s.r.o. |
13.33 TiB | 0.43% | 13.33 TiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
28.33 TiB | 0.91% | 28.33 TiB | 0.00% |
f0707721 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
26.27 TiB | 0.84% | 26.27 TiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
2.16 TiB | 0.07% | 2.16 TiB | 0.00% |
f01771403 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
1.98 TiB | 0.06% | 1.98 TiB | 0.00% |
f01886797 | Fremont, California, USZayo Bandwidth |
55.26 TiB | 1.77% | 55.26 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 44.75% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
134.94 TiB | 135.10 TiB | 1 | 4.32% |
386.68 TiB | 796.64 TiB | 2 | 25.47% |
154.15 TiB | 467.65 TiB | 3 | 14.95% |
119.08 TiB | 478.08 TiB | 4 | 15.29% |
76.35 TiB | 382.14 TiB | 5 | 12.22% |
56.57 TiB | 339.96 TiB | 6 | 10.87% |
41.13 TiB | 288.30 TiB | 7 | 9.22% |
17.81 TiB | 142.67 TiB | 8 | 4.56% |
7.94 TiB | 71.50 TiB | 9 | 2.29% |
2.44 TiB | 24.38 TiB | 10 | 0.78% |
96.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 11 | 0.03% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacea3fxvpdvhh7uc6gkhmwlowtipws5n3auz4wdgepmrfve4lzscrfq
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
4.55TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
3078a39b-e0b5-478e-bdb9-ca6d6658b9ea
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacea3fxvpdvhh7uc6gkhmwlowtipws5n3auz4wdgepmrfve4lzscrfq
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedco6al7mvjf7mimtvowfqbnlitdim5ca4to7nnqunxwxielghkdm
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
4.55TiB
Signer Address
f1wxhnytjmklj2czezaqcfl7eb4nkgmaxysnegwii
Id
3078a39b-e0b5-478e-bdb9-ca6d6658b9ea
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedco6al7mvjf7mimtvowfqbnlitdim5ca4to7nnqunxwxielghkdm
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?