Closed ribasushi closed 1 year ago
@ribasushi Hi! Great to see that you have gotten approval for DataCap! BDE is a verified deals auction house helping you to get paid storing your data with reliable storage providers. If you need any help, please get in touch.
f01858410
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
2000TiB
f01858410
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
s0nik42 & cryptowhizzard
800% of weekly dc amount requested
10.23GiB
2.68PiB
2.31PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
131693 | 48 | 4.55TiB | 15.61 | 848.01GiB |
Protocol Labs ( project: Slingshot Evergreen )
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
4
cryptowhizzard3
fabriziogianni73
flyworker1
jimcray3
MegTei2
s0nik421
swatchliu1
TimWilliams00
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new
.
For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
Provider | Location | Total Deals Sealed | Percentage | Unique Data | Duplicate Deals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f01423116 | Lillestrøm, Viken, NOAltibox AS |
4.60 TiB | 0.14% | 4.60 TiB | 0.00% |
f01310564 | Oslo, Oslo, NOAremark EDB AS |
6.01 TiB | 0.19% | 6.01 TiB | 0.00% |
f01611097 | Mission Viejo, California, USAT&T Services, Inc. |
127.17 TiB | 3.93% | 125.58 TiB | 1.25% |
f01278 | Grand Rapids, Michigan, USAT&T Services, Inc. |
15.00 TiB | 0.46% | 15.00 TiB | 0.00% |
f08403 | Bourton on the Water, England, GBBritish Telecommunications PLC |
59.21 TiB | 1.83% | 59.21 TiB | 0.00% |
f01801091 | Canton, Ohio, USCharter Communications Inc |
30.34 TiB | 0.94% | 30.34 TiB | 0.00% |
f01853438new |
Beijing, Beijing, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone |
2.17 TiB | 0.07% | 2.17 TiB | 0.00% |
f01747176new |
Beijing, Beijing, CNCHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone |
96.00 GiB | 0.00% | 96.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0142637 | Chengdu, Sichuan, CNCHINANET-BACKBONE |
1.66 TiB | 0.05% | 1.66 TiB | 0.00% |
f01345523 | Antwerpen, Flanders, BECogent Communications |
364.71 TiB | 11.28% | 364.71 TiB | 0.00% |
f01826669 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USCogent Communications |
79.95 TiB | 2.47% | 79.95 TiB | 0.00% |
f01883179 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USCogent Communications |
4.63 TiB | 0.14% | 4.63 TiB | 0.00% |
f010446 | Zaventem, Flanders, BECogent Communications |
32.00 GiB | 0.00% | 32.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01858429 | Boston, Massachusetts, USComcast Cable Communications, LLC |
16.02 TiB | 0.50% | 16.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01392893 | Amsterdam, North Holland, NLFusix Networks B.V. |
226.65 TiB | 7.01% | 226.65 TiB | 0.00% |
f010202 | Hong Kong, Central and Western, HKHK Broadband Network Ltd. |
480.00 GiB | 0.01% | 480.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f0773157 | Fremont, California, USHurricane Electric LLC |
9.59 TiB | 0.30% | 9.59 TiB | 0.00% |
f0104671 | Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JPKDDI CORPORATION |
386.00 GiB | 0.01% | 386.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f01840390 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
11.17 TiB | 0.35% | 11.17 TiB | 0.00% |
f01790264 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
4.23 TiB | 0.13% | 4.23 TiB | 0.00% |
f01466075 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
2.13 TiB | 0.07% | 2.13 TiB | 0.00% |
f01764587 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
1.50 TiB | 0.05% | 1.50 TiB | 0.00% |
f01871352 | Seoul, Seoul, KRKorea Telecom |
1.03 TiB | 0.03% | 1.03 TiB | 0.00% |
f01699939 | Gwangju, Gwangju, KRKorea Telecom |
604.50 GiB | 0.02% | 604.50 GiB | 0.00% |
f0717969 | Los Angeles, California, USKrypt Technologies |
319.98 TiB | 9.89% | 319.98 TiB | 0.00% |
f01847751 | Denver, Colorado, USLevel 3 Parent, LLC |
49.90 TiB | 1.54% | 49.90 TiB | 0.00% |
f01872811new |
Dallas, Texas, USLevel 3 Parent, LLC |
2.54 TiB | 0.08% | 2.54 TiB | 0.00% |
f0440429 | Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
186.83 TiB | 5.78% | 186.37 TiB | 0.24% |
f030379 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
120.87 TiB | 3.74% | 120.87 TiB | 0.01% |
f01806491 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
85.14 TiB | 2.63% | 85.11 TiB | 0.04% |
f033356 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
83.18 TiB | 2.57% | 83.15 TiB | 0.04% |
f03488 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
63.96 TiB | 1.98% | 63.83 TiB | 0.20% |
f024184 | Seoul, Seoul, KRLG DACOM Corporation |
37.94 TiB | 1.17% | 37.88 TiB | 0.16% |
f097777 | Kivertsi, Volyn, UALink Telecom Service Ltd |
608.00 GiB | 0.02% | 608.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f019551 | Birmingham, England, GBNeonix Web Services Limited |
6.25 TiB | 0.19% | 6.25 TiB | 0.00% |
f01775922 | Ashburn, Virginia, USNew Dream Network, LLC |
511.13 TiB | 15.80% | 505.25 TiB | 1.15% |
f01784458 | Oslo, Oslo, NONexthop AS |
108.85 TiB | 3.37% | 108.85 TiB | 0.00% |
f01163272 | Lys’va, Perm Krai, RUPJSC Rostelecom |
912.00 GiB | 0.03% | 912.00 GiB | 0.00% |
f02576 | Copenhagen, Capital Region, DKTelenor A/S |
36.02 TiB | 1.11% | 36.02 TiB | 0.00% |
f01752548 | Seattle, Washington, USWholesail networks LLC |
319.87 TiB | 9.89% | 296.03 TiB | 7.45% |
f01851231 | Seattle, Washington, USWholesail networks LLC |
202.67 TiB | 6.27% | 202.67 TiB | 0.00% |
f0838684 | Prague, Hlavní město Praha, CZWIA spol. s.r.o. |
14.08 TiB | 0.44% | 14.08 TiB | 0.00% |
f01240 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
28.33 TiB | 0.88% | 28.33 TiB | 0.00% |
f0707721 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
26.27 TiB | 0.81% | 26.27 TiB | 0.00% |
f01199430 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
2.16 TiB | 0.07% | 2.16 TiB | 0.00% |
f01771403 | Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NLWijnand Schouten trading as Speedium |
1.98 TiB | 0.06% | 1.98 TiB | 0.00% |
f01886797 | Vancouver, British Columbia, CAZayo Bandwidth |
55.26 TiB | 1.71% | 55.26 TiB | 0.00% |
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
⚠️ 44.89% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
Unique Data Size | Total Deals Made | Number of Providers | Deal Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
139.02 TiB | 139.17 TiB | 1 | 4.30% |
408.16 TiB | 839.54 TiB | 2 | 25.96% |
155.88 TiB | 472.91 TiB | 3 | 14.62% |
118.36 TiB | 475.12 TiB | 4 | 14.69% |
79.66 TiB | 398.74 TiB | 5 | 12.33% |
58.41 TiB | 351.04 TiB | 6 | 10.85% |
41.82 TiB | 293.20 TiB | 7 | 9.07% |
20.22 TiB | 161.95 TiB | 8 | 5.01% |
8.51 TiB | 76.63 TiB | 9 | 2.37% |
2.47 TiB | 24.69 TiB | 10 | 0.76% |
96.00 GiB | 1.03 TiB | 11 | 0.03% |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
This application needs porting over to LDN v3 rather than having a dedicated multisig from the v2 implementation of the LDN process. Last set of approvals have Error:17 (no DataCap balance) since the notary assigned to this is out.
Based on this, pushing a manual allocation for #6 for this address, but we need to swap this over. cc @simonkim0515 @galen-mcandrew can we get this systematically swapped over from deprecated notary to updated LDN v3 address?
f01858410
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
2000TiB
manually patching last comment from bot as well, just in case.
@s0nik42 @cryptowhizzard can you try resigning this one through notary tool now and let me know if it's working / the proposal is indeed for the intended 2000 TiB from the LDN v3 multisig?
wip
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary
bafy2bzacecdgtff4jkstmupgakfd7zkobumk6zs7tsj2hgwifgj6s2dbq6fbq
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1krmypm4uoxxf3g7okrwtrahlmpcph3y7rbqqgfa
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecdgtff4jkstmupgakfd7zkobumk6zs7tsj2hgwifgj6s2dbq6fbq
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedke2ujatzz7dlcfs75rohnrejflvpiygh4ipeoa7ew6wq2qvnhoi
Address
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
Datacap Allocated
500.00TiB
Signer Address
f1wxhnytjmklj2czezaqcfl7eb4nkgmaxysnegwii
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedke2ujatzz7dlcfs75rohnrejflvpiygh4ipeoa7ew6wq2qvnhoi
f01858410
f1pkrmygbvweykpjcut36lf7ewgqdfhjklbhvepda
s0nik42 & cryptowhizzard
total dc reached
0
2.68PiB
2.31PiB
Number of deals | Number of storage providers | Previous DC Allocated | Top provider | Remaining DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
131806 | 48 | 2000TiB | 15.6 | 32.01GiB |
Looks like still trying to pull from old msig, not the v3 LDN
hmmmm. ok still going to the old notary ID. cc @fabriziogianni7 might be a bug, but feels like quite an edge case. going to pivot into making a new application for this one instead to reduce complexity. Will stick with remaining PiBs but inflate the weekly rate for it to keep up.
Closing this one out in favor of https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/1576
Large Dataset Notary Application
To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.
Core Information
Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.
Project details
Share a brief history of your project and organization.
What is the primary source of funding for this project?
What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?
Use-case details
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?
Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?
DataCap allocation plan
In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?
How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.
How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?
Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?