Improve activities for GitOps

fleetdm / fleet

Open-source platform for IT, security, and infrastructure teams. (Linux, macOS, Chrome, Windows, cloud, data center)

https://fleetdm.com

Other

2.99k stars 414 forks source link

Improve activities for GitOps #16678

Open getvictor opened 7 months ago

getvictor commented 7 months ago

Goal

User story
As a user that merged a PR in my GitOps repo that uses Fleet's best practice GitOps ,
I want to see a clear message that I made a change to Fleet in my GitOps repo
so that I can go to GitHub to see what change I made.

Context

Requestor(s): @getvictor
Product designer: @rachaelshaw

Current activities generated when a PR is merged in GitOps repo (fleetctl gitops runs):

Changes

Product

[ ] UI changes: Figma
[ ] CLI usage changes: When fleetctl gitops runs, generate a single activity instead of activities for every individual change.

Engineering

[ ] Database schema migrations: TODO
[ ] Load testing: TODO

ℹ️ Please read this issue carefully and understand it. Pay special attention to UI wireframes, especially "dev notes".

QA

Risk assessment

Requires load testing: TODO
Risk level: Low / High TODO
Risk description: TODO

Manual testing steps

Step 1
Step 2
Step 3

Testing notes

Confirmation

[ ] Engineer (@____): Added comment to user story confirming successful completion of QA.
[ ] QA (@____): Added comment to user story confirming successful completion of QA.

noahtalerman commented 6 months ago

Hey @getvictor heads up, we didn't get to this in the last design sprint.

Bringing it back to feature fest.

noahtalerman commented 6 months ago

Noah: Let's understand whether the changes we make for GitOps activity affect fleetctl apply and/or Puppet module activities.

Related discussion in Slack here (internal): https://fleetdm.slack.com/archives/C03C41L5YEL/p1711464429022319

noahtalerman commented 6 months ago

Hey @getvictor, heads up, we brought this into the upcoming design sprint (4.49).

getvictor commented 5 months ago

@rachaelshaw we need additional messages because there are a couple of use cases here.

gitops runs via workflow based on our gitops best practices repo. A gitops user would typically run this.
A single user runs something like fleetctl gitops -f teams/my-team.yml
gitops flow runs, applies some changes, but fails. This can happen if --dry-run was not run first, or due to some corner cases.

noahtalerman commented 5 months ago

there are a couple of use cases here.

gitops runs via workflow based on our gitops best practices repo. A gitops user would typically run this.

A single user runs something like fleetctl gitops -f teams/my-team.yml

gitops flow runs, applies some changes, but fails. This can happen if --dry-run was not run first, or due to some corner cases.

@getvictor understood that any of these use cases (scenarios) are possible.

However, fleetctl gitops is only intended for use w/ best practice GitHub action (first scenario above). The plan is to document this as such. (docs PR here)

I think this means that we don't want to have additional messages for the second scenario: running fleetctl gitops outside of the GitHub action.

For the third scenario, the GitHub action always runs --dry-run first, right? If yes, I think we don't need an additional message for the third workflow.

cc @rachaelshaw @marko-lisica

rachaelshaw commented 5 months ago

@getvictor we decided to keep this message as-is (per @noahtalerman's comment above)

sharon-fdm commented 5 months ago

Estimations: FE: 1 BE: 5