Open dherder opened 3 months ago
Thanks @dherder. This is a request from security right? (not IT) Just double checking.
If we can't add all the tables, these are the most important: see https://github.com/shawnhank/osq-ext-bin/blob/master/tables-schema/win_dns_events.table https://github.com/shawnhank/osq-ext-bin/blob/master/tables-schema/win_dns_response_events.table https://github.com/shawnhank/osq-ext-bin/blob/master/tables-schema/win_file_events.table https://github.com/shawnhank/osq-ext-bin/blob/master/tables-schema/win_http_events.table https://github.com/shawnhank/osq-ext-bin/blob/master/tables-schema/win_registry_events.table https://github.com/shawnhank/osq-ext-bin/blob/master/tables-schema/win_removable_media_events.table
What tables is Fleet missing?
dns_lookup_events
ranked_addresses
upt_asset_interfaces
upt_assets
ranked_extensions
http_events
File auditing events are supported on Linux and macOS. Recently, we added process auditing on Windows. Additional work is required to add file, http, and DNS auditing on Windows. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/18HKASG9x6YY68ACp4RJR-wBKaXXtz4Et6h1yOWjLVSE/edit?usp=sharing
Ideally, we would add all of the Windows evented tables from https://github.com/shawnhank/osq-ext-bin/tree/master/tables-schema
I just heard a bit about this from @ambrusps. Some thoughts:
1) Unfortunately we can't use that "osq-ext-bin" as it's not open source. That was built by https://www.linkedin.com/in/atulkabra/ and his team at his former startup, Polylogyx.
2) File, DNS, and HTTP auditing on Windows are likely pretty significant work (potentially a week or more each, but I'm not super familiar with the domain). The good news is that I think the work that Marcos did to make it easier to build ETW-event based tables in osquery should be a help on each of these. He also provided some more context on the possibilities.
3) I'm not certain that ranked_addresses
, upt_asset_interfaces
, and upt_assets
, are tables that need to be built. We need to get a better understanding of what these queries are doing as they may be able to be satisfied with interface_details
and interface_addresses
.
4) ranked_extensions
is not actually a table it's just created in the query that uses it. I think that the existing extension tables should work? Not 100% sure.
prospect-seidel
: Queries they run today:dns_lookup_events
ranked_addresses
upt_asset_interfaces
upt_assets
ranked_extensions
http_events
chrome_download_history
edge_url_history
firefox_url_history
windows_recent_files
chrome_url_history
edge_download_history
firefox_download_history
ranked_addresses
,upt_asset_interfaces
, andupt_assets
, are tables that need to be built. We need to get a better understanding of what these queries are doing as they may be able to be satisfied withinterface_details
andinterface_addresses
.@zwass:
ranked_extensions
is not actually a table it's just created in the query that uses it. I think that the existing extension tables should work? Not 100% sure.User stories
24198