Closed m1ci closed 9 years ago
The first issue should be adressed, I agree (will let you know if it's fixed). As for the second: pure technically, you can insert whatever you want as header into an HTTP request, as long as it obeys the format. It is a good question to see if it is up to the pipelining service to check that. Personally I think it is up to the service in question to check headers / content and reply with an error.
The first issue should be adressed, I agree (will let you know if it's fixed).
OK
As for the second: pure technically, you can insert whatever you want as header into an HTTP request, as long as it obeys the format. It is a good question to see if it is up to the pipelining service to check that. Personally I think it is up to the service in question to check headers / content and reply with an error.
I agree.
Issue 1 should be fixed: in the case of the example, the response body is:
{
"exception": "eu.freme.broker.exception.NotAcceptableException",
"path": "/pipelining/chain",
"message": "Error detected in the JSON body contents: Request 1: field \"hea\" not known.",
"error": "Not Acceptable",
"status": 406,
"timestamp": 1440081037672
}
Can you re-test ?
test passed, well done!
e-Entity -> e-Link
pipeline1.json is the same e-Entity -> e-Link pipeline from the documentation with only changed the “headers” part to:
Results:
Example: