search

fzi-forschungszentrum-informatik / Lanelet2

Map handling framework for automated driving
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
800 stars 327 forks source link

Lanelet2 vs. OpenDrive 2.0 Area Concept #266

Closed mantkiew closed 1 year ago

mantkiew commented 1 year ago

Hello, currently OpenDrive 1.x and Lanelet2 are largely incompatible. However, there's a new initiative within OpenDrive called "Area Concept" to align it with common GIS methods. It seems to me that the Area Concept basically moves towards Lanelet2 design without explicitly mentioning it.

https://www.asam.net/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=3907&token=fffa694711f0cd3cc37e61f38587b3a308e9a720#_concept_paper_wp05_area_model

It would be great to have a detailed comparison between Lanelet2 design and OpenDrive Area Concept design (which can replace the OpenDrive 1.x modeling using reference line).

m-naumann commented 1 year ago

Thanks for this insight. From the first glance at the comparison, the Area Layer looks much like lanelet2. The largest difference I spot is that we model the "traffic area" as union of all lanelets and other polygons, and the lane markings as part of them, whereas in the Area Concept, there are different layers for each of these. Still, this concept would make conversion much easier, I guess.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity. Is this issue still work in progress? If yes, mark it as "WIP" or comment, otherwise it will be closed in 30 days.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 30 days with no activity.