Open felixf4xu opened 2 months ago
2 and 3 will be conflicting
, to indicate a vehicle on 2 would be in the path of a vehicle on 3 (or vica versa) and hence a collision is possible.
It's not possible to make a lane change from 2 to 3, since they don't share a common border. If you want to indicate that a vehicle on 2 can use the whole area when driving towards 1, you could increase the left border of 2 so that 2 covers the whole area of 3.
@poggenhans Thanks for the comment.
I tried to merge 2 and 3 into one new lanelet, but then I can't find a route from 4 (or 5) to 1. Lanelet 4 (or 5) does not take the new merged lanelet as its next lanelet.
I'm using RoutingGraph::getRoute()
to get the route.
Merging the two into a single lanelet won't work. But you could e.g. extend the right border of lanelet 3 so that it also includes the first point of the right border of lanelet 2. The result is that a vehicle coming from 5 and driving towards 1 has the full combined area of 2 and 3 at its disposal for driving.
Hi,
I would like to create a map like this: lanelet id 2 (circled in green) and lanelet id 3 (circled in yellow) are merging into lanelet id 1.
I would like to make lane change possible from lanelet 2 to lanelet 3, in this case, what is the relationship between id 2 and 3? I'm referrring to this type: