News! We have released a TF2 implementation of SimCLR (along with converted checkpoints in TF2), they are in tf2/ folder.
News! Colabs for Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Losses are added, see here.
We opensourced total 65 pretrained models here, corresponding to those in Table 1 of the SimCLRv2 paper:
Depth | Width | SK | Param (M) | F-T (1%) | F-T(10%) | F-T(100%) | Linear eval | Supervised |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 1X | False | 24 | 57.9 | 68.4 | 76.3 | 71.7 | 76.6 |
50 | 1X | True | 35 | 64.5 | 72.1 | 78.7 | 74.6 | 78.5 |
50 | 2X | False | 94 | 66.3 | 73.9 | 79.1 | 75.6 | 77.8 |
50 | 2X | True | 140 | 70.6 | 77.0 | 81.3 | 77.7 | 79.3 |
101 | 1X | False | 43 | 62.1 | 71.4 | 78.2 | 73.6 | 78.0 |
101 | 1X | True | 65 | 68.3 | 75.1 | 80.6 | 76.3 | 79.6 |
101 | 2X | False | 170 | 69.1 | 75.8 | 80.7 | 77.0 | 78.9 |
101 | 2X | True | 257 | 73.2 | 78.8 | 82.4 | 79.0 | 80.1 |
152 | 1X | False | 58 | 64.0 | 73.0 | 79.3 | 74.5 | 78.3 |
152 | 1X | True | 89 | 70.0 | 76.5 | 81.3 | 77.2 | 79.9 |
152 | 2X | False | 233 | 70.2 | 76.6 | 81.1 | 77.4 | 79.1 |
152 | 2X | True | 354 | 74.2 | 79.4 | 82.9 | 79.4 | 80.4 |
152 | 3X | True | 795 | 74.9 | 80.1 | 83.1 | 79.8 | 80.5 |
These checkpoints are stored in Google Cloud Storage:
We also provide examples on how to use the checkpoints in colabs/
folder.
The pre-trained models (base network with linear classifier layer) can be found below. Note that for these SimCLRv1 checkpoints, the projection head is not available.
Model checkpoint and hub-module | ImageNet Top-1 |
---|---|
ResNet50 (1x) | 69.1 |
ResNet50 (2x) | 74.2 |
ResNet50 (4x) | 76.6 |
Additional SimCLRv1 checkpoints are available: gs://simclr-checkpoints/simclrv1.
A note on the signatures of the TensorFlow Hub module: default
is the representation output of the base network; logits_sup
is the supervised classification logits for ImageNet 1000 categories. Others (e.g. initial_max_pool
, block_group1
) are middle layers of ResNet; refer to resnet.py for the specifics. See this tutorial for additional information regarding use of TensorFlow Hub modules.
Our models are trained with TPUs. It is recommended to run distributed training with TPUs when using our code for pretraining.
Our code can also run on a single GPU. It does not support multi-GPUs, for reasons such as global BatchNorm and contrastive loss across cores.
The code is compatible with both TensorFlow v1 and v2. See requirements.txt for all prerequisites, and you can also install them using the following command.
pip install -r requirements.txt
To pretrain the model on CIFAR-10 with a single GPU, try the following command:
python run.py --train_mode=pretrain \
--train_batch_size=512 --train_epochs=1000 \
--learning_rate=1.0 --weight_decay=1e-4 --temperature=0.5 \
--dataset=cifar10 --image_size=32 --eval_split=test --resnet_depth=18 \
--use_blur=False --color_jitter_strength=0.5 \
--model_dir=/tmp/simclr_test --use_tpu=False
To pretrain the model on ImageNet with Cloud TPUs, first check out the Google Cloud TPU tutorial for basic information on how to use Google Cloud TPUs.
Once you have created virtual machine with Cloud TPUs, and pre-downloaded the ImageNet data for tensorflow_datasets, please set the following enviroment variables:
TPU_NAME=<tpu-name>
STORAGE_BUCKET=gs://<storage-bucket>
DATA_DIR=$STORAGE_BUCKET/<path-to-tensorflow-dataset>
MODEL_DIR=$STORAGE_BUCKET/<path-to-store-checkpoints>
The following command can be used to pretrain a ResNet-50 on ImageNet (which reflects the default hyperparameters in our paper):
python run.py --train_mode=pretrain \
--train_batch_size=4096 --train_epochs=100 --temperature=0.1 \
--learning_rate=0.075 --learning_rate_scaling=sqrt --weight_decay=1e-4 \
--dataset=imagenet2012 --image_size=224 --eval_split=validation \
--data_dir=$DATA_DIR --model_dir=$MODEL_DIR \
--use_tpu=True --tpu_name=$TPU_NAME --train_summary_steps=0
A batch size of 4096 requires at least 32 TPUs. 100 epochs takes around 6 hours with 32 TPU v3s. Note that learning rate of 0.3 with learning_rate_scaling=linear
is equivalent to that of 0.075 with learning_rate_scaling=sqrt
when the batch size is 4096. However, using sqrt scaling allows it to train better when smaller batch size is used.
To fine-tune a linear head (with a single GPU), try the following command:
python run.py --mode=train_then_eval --train_mode=finetune \
--fine_tune_after_block=4 --zero_init_logits_layer=True \
--variable_schema='(?!global_step|(?:.*/|^)Momentum|head)' \
--global_bn=False --optimizer=momentum --learning_rate=0.1 --weight_decay=0.0 \
--train_epochs=100 --train_batch_size=512 --warmup_epochs=0 \
--dataset=cifar10 --image_size=32 --eval_split=test --resnet_depth=18 \
--checkpoint=/tmp/simclr_test --model_dir=/tmp/simclr_test_ft --use_tpu=False
You can check the results using tensorboard, such as
python -m tensorboard.main --logdir=/tmp/simclr_test
As a reference, the above runs on CIFAR-10 should give you around 91% accuracy, though it can be further optimized.
For fine-tuning a linear head on ImageNet using Cloud TPUs, first set the CHKPT_DIR
to pretrained model dir and set a new MODEL_DIR
, then use the following command:
python run.py --mode=train_then_eval --train_mode=finetune \
--fine_tune_after_block=4 --zero_init_logits_layer=True \
--variable_schema='(?!global_step|(?:.*/|^)Momentum|head)' \
--global_bn=False --optimizer=momentum --learning_rate=0.1 --weight_decay=1e-6 \
--train_epochs=90 --train_batch_size=4096 --warmup_epochs=0 \
--dataset=imagenet2012 --image_size=224 --eval_split=validation \
--data_dir=$DATA_DIR --model_dir=$MODEL_DIR --checkpoint=$CHKPT_DIR \
--use_tpu=True --tpu_name=$TPU_NAME --train_summary_steps=0
As a reference, the above runs on ImageNet should give you around 64.5% accuracy.
You can access 1% and 10% ImageNet subsets used for semi-supervised learning via tensorflow datasets: simply set dataset=imagenet2012_subset/1pct
and dataset=imagenet2012_subset/10pct
in the command line for fine-tuning on these subsets.
You can also find image IDs of these subsets in imagenet_subsets/
.
To fine-tune the whole network on ImageNet (1% of labels), refer to the following command:
python run.py --mode=train_then_eval --train_mode=finetune \
--fine_tune_after_block=-1 --zero_init_logits_layer=True \
--variable_schema='(?!global_step|(?:.*/|^)Momentum|head_supervised)' \
--global_bn=True --optimizer=lars --learning_rate=0.005 \
--learning_rate_scaling=sqrt --weight_decay=0 \
--train_epochs=60 --train_batch_size=1024 --warmup_epochs=0 \
--dataset=imagenet2012_subset/1pct --image_size=224 --eval_split=validation \
--data_dir=$DATA_DIR --model_dir=$MODEL_DIR --checkpoint=$CHKPT_DIR \
--use_tpu=True --tpu_name=$TPU_NAME --train_summary_steps=0 \
--num_proj_layers=3 --ft_proj_selector=1
Set the checkpoint
to those that are only pre-trained but not fine-tuned. Given that SimCLRv1 checkpoints do not contain projection head, it is recommended to run with SimCLRv2 checkpoints (you can still run with SimCLRv1 checkpoints, but variable_schema
needs to exclude head
). The num_proj_layers
and ft_proj_selector
need to be adjusted accordingly following SimCLRv2 paper to obtain best performances.
This repo provides a solution for converting the pretrained SimCLRv1 Tensorflow checkpoints into Pytorch ones.
This repo provides a solution for converting the pretrained SimCLRv2 Tensorflow checkpoints into Pytorch ones.
(Feel free to share your implementation by creating an issue)
Implementations in PyTorch:
Implementations in Tensorflow 2 / Keras (official TF2 implementation was added in tf2/ folder):
Batch size: original results of SimCLR were tuned under a large batch size (i.e. 4096), which leads to suboptimal results when training using a smaller batch size. However, with a good set of hyper-parameters (mainly learning rate, temperature, projection head depth), small batch sizes can yield results that are on par with large batch sizes (e.g., see Table 2 in this paper).
Pretrained models / Checkpoints: SimCLRv1 and SimCLRv2 are pretrained with different weight decays, so the pretrained models from the two versions have very different weight norm scales (convolutional weights in SimCLRv1 ResNet-50 are on average 16.8X of that in SimCLRv2). For fine-tuning the pretrained models from both versions, it is fine if you use an LARS optimizer, but it requires very different hyperparameters (e.g. learning rate, weight decay) if you use the momentum optimizer. So for the latter case, you may want to either search for very different hparams according to which version used, or re-scale th weight (i.e. conv kernel
parameters of base_model
in the checkpoints) to make sure they're roughly in the same scale.
@article{chen2020simple,
title={A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations},
author={Chen, Ting and Kornblith, Simon and Norouzi, Mohammad and Hinton, Geoffrey},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05709},
year={2020}
}
@article{chen2020big,
title={Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learners},
author={Chen, Ting and Kornblith, Simon and Swersky, Kevin and Norouzi, Mohammad and Hinton, Geoffrey},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10029},
year={2020}
}
This is not an official Google product.