Closed wfmackey closed 4 years ago
> PolicyGrid %>%
+ filter(schools_open == FALSE,
+ r_distribution == "lnorm") %>%
+ nrow()
[1] 0
Damn that's a blunder. Consequence of a hacksaw approach to reducing model output runtime. We do have school_days_per_wk == 1
and r_distribution == lnorm
as a second-best salvage.
lol yeah it's the consequence of a chain of like three %implies%
functions.
Possible to get in the next couple of days?
Options are:
(I think in my defence that I thought almost all states were going to have at least one day a week back to school + wanted to exhibit cauchy distribution, but definitely didn't intend for so few lnorm distros.)
I'm not 100% sure what's in the pipeline -- can you list out what has been/will be sent to unimelb for running?
First step is to reduce the size of the repo: that's underway on my computer.
Then I need to develop the package to change the infection parameters to reflect the attack rates for children/workplaces/households.
But the cluster can't do both versions at once, the new version should be done after the old one. and the new results won't be comparable to the old.
I haven't decided what grid to send to unimelb once the new version is working.
Because of the
%implies%
conditions,PolicyGrid
doesn't allow for schools to be open with a non-Cauchy distribution:https://github.com/grattan/covid19.model.sa2/blob/e4f174c83c60ff3582d08a5f7ab1264ddceb2492/results/2020-05-07/runner28.R#L46-L69
We need this in the Shiny app given people's aversion to Cauchy.