This repository includes the example Smart Contract referenced in this issue.
To set up and fix your Foundry tests with Hedera forking, follow these steps
Install the Hedera Forking Library
forge install git@github.com:hashgraph/hedera-forking.git
Add Setup Code in Your Test Files Include the following lines in the setup phase of your tests to deploy the required contract code and enable cheat codes:
deployCodeTo("HtsSystemContractInitialized.sol", address(0x167));
vm.allowCheatcodes(address(0x167));
To run the tests and observe the setup in action, use the following command
forge test --fork-url "https://mainnet.hashio.io/api" --chain 295 --match-contract DealCheatCodeIssueTest
To use this library in your tests, you need to enable ffi
. You can do this by adding the following lines to your .toml
file:
[profile.default]
ffi = true
Alternatively, you can add the --ffi
flag to your execution script.
This is necessary because our library uses surl
, which relies on ffi
to make requests.
Fork Testing (or WaffleJS Fixtures) is an Ethereum Development Environment feature that optimizes test execution for Smart Contracts. It enables snapshotting of blockchain state, saving developement time by avoiding the recreation of the entire blockchain state for each test. Instead, tests can revert to a pre-defined snapshot, streamlining the testing process. Most populars Ethereum Development Environments provide this feature, such as Foundry and Hardhat.
This feature is enabled by their underlaying Development network, for example
Please note that WaffleJS, when used directly as a library, i.e., not inside a Hardhat project, uses Ganache internally.
On the other hand, Geth support some sort of snapshotting with https://geth.ethereum.org/docs/interacting-with-geth/rpc/ns-debug#debugsethead, but it’s not commonly used for development and testing of Smart Contracts.
Moreover, given that Fork testing runs on a local development network, users can use console.log
in tests to ease the debugging process.
With console.log
, you can print logging messages and contract variables calling console.log
from your Solidity code.
Both Foundry and Hardhat support console.log
.
Not being able to use Forking (see below) implies also not being able to use console.log
in tests,
which cause frustration among Hedera users.
Yes, Fork Testing works well when the Smart Contracts are standard EVM Smart Contracts that do not involve Hedera-specific services. This is because fork testing is targeted at the local test network provided by the Ethereum Development Environment. These networks are somewhat replicas of the Ethereum network and do not support Hedera-specific services.
No, Fork Testing will not work on Hedera for contracts that are specific to Hedera.
For example, if a contract includes calls to the createFungibleToken
method on the HTS System Contract at address(0x167)
.
This is because the internal local test network provided by the framework (chainId: 1337
) does not have the precompiled HTS contract deployed at address(0x167)
.
This project is an attempt to solve this problem. It does so by providing an emulation layer for HTS written in Solidity. Given it is written in Solidity, it can executed in a development network environment, such as Foundry or Hardhat.
This project has two main parts
HtsSystemContract.sol
Solidity Contract.
This contract provides an emulator for the Hedera Token Service written in Solidity.
It is specially designed to work in a forked network.
Its storage reads and writes are crafted to be reversible in a way the hedera-forking
package can fetch the appropriate data.@hashgraph/hedera-forking
CommonJS Package.
Provides functions that can be hooked into the Relay to fetch the appropiate data when HTS System Contract (at address 0x167
) or Hedera Tokens are invoked.
This package uses the compilation output of the HtsSystemContract
contract to return its bytecode and to map storage slots to field names.[!IMPORTANT] The compilation output of
HtsSystemContract
is version controlled. The benefit of including a generated file is that it allows the Relay to consume the JS package directly from GitHub. This is also the reason we use JSDoc instead of TypeScript, to avoid the compilation step. This, in turn, avoids publishing annpm
package.
The following sequence diagram showcases the messages sent between components when fork testing is activated within an Ethereum Development Environment, e.g., Foundry or Hardhat.
[!NOTE] The JSON-RPC Relay service is not shown here because is not involved when performing a requests for a Token.
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
box Local
actor user as User
participant client as Local Network<br/>Foundry's Anvil, Hardhat's EDR
participant hedera-forking as Hardhat Forking Plugin
end
box Remote
#participant relay as JSON-RPC Relay
participant mirror as Mirror Node
end
user->>+client: address(Token).totalSupply()
client->>+hedera-forking: eth_getCode(Token)
hedera-forking->>+mirror: API tokens/<tokenId>
mirror-->>-hedera-forking: Token {}
hedera-forking-->>-client: HIP-719 Token Proxy bytecode<br/>(delegate calls to 0x167)
client->> + hedera-forking: eth_getCode(0x167)
hedera-forking-->>-client: HtsSystemContract bytecode
client->>+hedera-forking: eth_getStorageAt(Token, slot<totalSupply>)
#relay ->> + hedera-forking: getHtsStorageAt(Token, slot)
hedera-forking -) + mirror: API tokens/<tokenId>
mirror --) - hedera-forking: Token{}
#hedera-forking -->> - relay: Token{}.totalSupply
hedera-forking-->>-client: Token{}.totalSupply
client->>-user: Token{}.totalSupply
The relevant interactions are
hedera-services
implementation.getHtsCode
which in turn returns the bytecode compiled from HtsSystemContract.sol
.getHtsStorageAt
which uses the HtsSystemContract
's Storage Layout to fetch the appropriate state from the Mirror Node. The (8) JSON-RPC call is triggered as part of the redirectForToken(address,bytes)
method call defined in HIP-719.
Even if the call from HIP-719 is custom encoded, this method call should support standard ABI encoding as well as defined in
hedera-services
.This repo consists of two projects/packages.
A Foundry project, to compile and test the HtsSystemContract.sol
contract.
And an npm
package that implements the eth_getCode
and eth_getStorageAt
JSON-RPC calls when HTS emulation is involved.
To compile the HtsSystemContract
and test contracts
forge build
[!TIP] Keep in mind the compilation output of
HtsSystemContract
is versioned. So it will appear as modified afterforge build
whenHtsSystemContract
has been changed.
There is no compilation step to build the @hashgraph/hedera-forking
package.
However, you can type-check it by running
npm run type-check
[!TIP] The
launch-token
script was used to deploy Tokens using HTS totestnet
for testing purposes.
getHtsCode
and getHtsStorageAt
Unit TestsThese tests only involve testing both getHtsCode
and getHtsStorageAt
functions.
In other words, they do not use the HtsSystemContract
bytecode, only its storageLayout
definition.
npm run test
HtsSystemContract
Solidity tests + local storage emulation (without forking)Foundry provides a Std Storage library, "that makes manipulating storage easy". See https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge-std/std-storage for more information.
We use the Std Storage library to provide local storage emulation that allow us to run HtsSystemContract
Solidity tests without starting out a separate JSON-RPC process.
forge test
[!NOTE] When running these tests without forking from a remote network, the package
@hashgraph/hedera-forking
is not under test.
HtsSystemContract
Solidity tests + JSON-RPC mock server for storage emulation (with forking)These Solidity tests are used to test both the HtsSystemContract
and the @hashgraph/hedera-forking
package.
Instead of starting a local-node
or using a remote network,
they use the json-rpc-mock.js
script as a backend without the need for any additional service.
This is the network Foundry's Anvil is forking from.
In a separate terminal run the JSON-RPC Mock Server
./scripts/json-rpc-mock.js
Then run
forge test --fork-url http://localhost:7546 --no-storage-caching
[!IMPORTANT] The
--no-storage-caching
flag disables the JSON-RPC calls cache, which is important to make sure thejson-rpc-mock.js
is reached in each JSON-RPC call. See https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-test#description for more information.
You can use the --match-contract
flag to filter the tests to be executed if needed.
In addition, usually when debugging the contract under test we are interested in getting the Solidity traces.
We can use the forge
flag -vvvv
to display them.
For example
forge test --match-contract TokenTest -vvvv
HtsSystemContract
Solidity tests + Relay for storage emulation (with forking)These tests are the same of the section above, but instead of using the json-rpc-mock.js
it uses the Relay with hedera-forking
enabled pointing to testnet
.
The Solidity compiler solc
provides an option to generate detailed storage layout information as part of the build output.
This feature can be enabled by selecting the storageLayout
option,
which provides insights into how variables are stored in contract storage.
In Hardhat.
To generate the storage layout using Hardhat,
you need to modify the Hardhat configuration file hardhat.config.js
as follows
module.exports = {
solidity: {
settings: {
outputSelection: {
'*': {
'*': ['storageLayout'],
},
},
},
},
};
With this configuration, the storage layout information will be included in the build artifacts. You can find this information in the following path within the build output
output -> contracts -> ContractName.sol -> ContractName -> storageLayout
In Foundry.
Add the following line to your foundry.toml
file
extra_output = ["storageLayout"]
The storageLayout
object is included in the output file out/<Contract name>.sol/<Contract name>.json
.
[!IMPORTANT] This is the one used in this project.
The storage layout is represented in JSON format with the following fields
astId
. The identifier in the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST).contract
. The name of the contract.label
. The name of the instance variable.offset
. The starting location of the variable within a uint256
storage word.
Multiple variables may be packed into a single memory slot when their types are smaller than a 32 bytes word.
In such cases, the offset
value for the second and subsequent variables will differ from 0
.slot
. A integer representing the slot number in storage.type
. The type of the value stored in the slot.See https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/internals/layout_in_storage.html#json-output for more information.
For the purpose of our implementation, understanding which variable names are stored in specific slots is sufficient to develop a functional emulator for the token smart contract.
When dealing with mappings, arrays, and strings longer than 31 bytes in Solidity, these data types do not fit entirely within a single storage slot. This creates challenges when trying to access or compute their storage locations.
For mappings, the value is not stored directly in the storage slot. Instead, to access a specific value in a mapping, you must first calculate the storage slot by computing the Keccak-256 hash of the concatenation of the "key" (the mapped value) and the "slot" number where the mapping is declared.
bytes32 storageSlot = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(key, uint256(slotNumber)));
To reverse-engineer or retrieve the original key (e.g., an address or token ID) from a storage slot, you'd need to maintain a mapping of keys to their corresponding storage hashes, which can be cumbersome.
For our current use case, where we need to calculate these values for user addresses and token IDs (which are integers), this is manageable
Handling strings longer than 31 bytes is more complex
Calculate the Slot Hash. Start by calculating the Keccak-256 hash of the slot number where the string is stored.
bytes32 hashSlot = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(uint256(slotNumber)));
Retrieve the Value. Access the value stored at this hash slot. If the string exceeds 32 bytes, retrieve the additional segments from consecutive slots (e.g., hashSlot + 1
, hashSlot + 2
, etc.), until the entire string is reconstructed.
This process requires careful calculation and multiple reads from storage to handle longer strings properly.
If you have a question on how to use the product, please see our support guide.
Contributions are welcome. Please see the contributing guide to see how you can get involved.
This project is governed by the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. By participating, you are expected to uphold this code of conduct. Please report unacceptable behavior to oss@hedera.com.
Please do not file a public ticket mentioning the vulnerability. Refer to the security policy defined in the SECURITY.md.