Open 0xbb opened 9 years ago
Dear Bruno!
The program did not really get stuck, it just takes much longer with the new version. This can be confirmed by making the instance smaller.
I did not analyze the reason in detail, but we changed several default settings in the most recent development version. As always, this is good for many instances, but might be counter-productive for others (like yours, obviously). Passing the --nocache option seems to make the evaluation of your program much faster (we did not change this option, but it seems to cancel out the effects of other changes).
Best regards, Christoph
2015-06-22 17:03 GMT+02:00 Bruno Bierbaumer notifications@github.com:
Hello! When I run this hex program (example.hex):
time(0).time(1).time(2).time(3).time(4).
exp(START, END) :- time(START), time(END), START <= END, &window[START, END](T, V) , V != 3.
all_three(START,END) :- time(START), time(END), START <= END, not exp(START, END).
Together with this python plugin (example.py):
import dlvhex def values(tup): print "&values:["+",".join(x.value() for x in tup)+"]"
start = int(tup[0].value()) end = int(tup[1].value()) for i in range(start, end+1): dlvhex.output((i,i )) print "======="
def register(): dlvhex.addAtom("values", (dlvhex.TUPLE,), 2)
I run the example with dlvhex2 --pythonplugin=example.py example.hex
dlvhex 2.4.0 gives me this output:
DLVHEX 2.4.0 [build Jun 22 2015 gcc 4.8.2]
&values:[0,0]
&values:[0,1]
&values:[1,1]
&values:[0,2]
&values:[1,2]
&values:[2,2]
&values:[0,3]
&values:[1,3]
&values:[2,3]
&values:[3,3]
&values:[0,4]
&values:[1,4]
&values:[2,4]
&values:[3,4]
&values:[4,4]
{time(0),time(1),time(2),time(3),time(4),exp(0,0),exp(0,1),exp(1,1),exp(0,2),exp(1,2),exp(2,2),exp(0,3),exp(1,3),exp(2,3),exp(0,4),exp(1,4),exp(2,4),exp(3,4),exp(4,4),all_three(3,3)}
The current version on GitHub (0ba9943 https://github.com/hexhex/core/commit/0ba994396aeff1939e221512eced800649a86242) hangs with this output:
DLVHEX 2.4.0 [build Jun 22 2015 gcc 4.8.2]
&values:[0,0]
&values:[0,1]
&values:[1,1]
&values:[0,2]
&values:[1,2]
&values:[2,2]
&values:[0,3]
&values:[1,3]
&values:[2,3]
&values:[3,3]
&values:[0,4]
&values:[1,4]
&values:[2,4]
&values:[3,4]
&values:[4,4]
&values:[0,0]
Both binaries were compiled with PYTHON_BIN=python2.7 ./configure on a computer running Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS.
I am not sure if I am using the Python Plugin Framwork right or if there is an issue with dlvhex. Any help would be very appreciated!
Greetings Bruno
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/hexhex/core/issues/16.
Hi Christoph, thank you for your answer!
I think you are right that the solver just takes a long time to solve this program.
For now the workaround with passing --nocache
works for me. :thumbsup:
Thanks again, Bruno
Hello! When I run this hex program (example.hex):
Together with this python plugin (example.py):
I run the example with
dlvhex2 --pythonplugin=example.py example.hex
dlvhex 2.4.0 gives me this output:
The current version on GitHub (0ba994396aeff1939e221512eced800649a86242) hangs with this output:
Both binaries were compiled with
PYTHON_BIN=python2.7 ./configure
on a computer running Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS.I am not sure if I am using the Python Plugin Framwork right or if there is an issue with dlvhex. Any help would be very appreciated!
Greetings Bruno