Open chapb opened 2 years ago
@rreidsmi, if you have a chance to review this before Tuesday's iAM meeting, that'd be great!
Anne Deckert kindly went over these terms with me and provided some feedback (overall, she thinks they're great as is), which I'll get into below, as well as some additional thoughts I had after speaking with her.
Anne's Main Feedback:
After-thoughts I had:
And, finally, some examples of pig factors that would be good examples for each of these categorizations:
Terms for Factor Applicability to the Canadian Context
Purpose
We are looking to develop the terminology used to describe factor applicability to the Canadian context. We consider the applicability separately in three different time periods: Past, Present, Future. This avoids us requiring terms referencing potential changes between time periods.
Suggested Terms
These terms can be applied nationally or regionally depending on the circumstance; the terms 'standard' and 'uncommon' should not be interpreted in a geographical context. For example, a standard practice implemented only in Alberta is still considered a standard practice, even though it may not be used in other regions.
Standard Practice
Uncommon Practice
Banned
Discouraged
Not Adopted
Unknown / Other?