issues
search
ietf-wg-httpapi
/
ratelimit-headers
Repository for IETF WG draft ratelimit-headers
Other
42
stars
4
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Editorial improvements
#30
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
0
Editorial improvements
#29
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
0
Fix: #27. Performance concerns on providing ratelimit headers
#28
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
3
Performance concerns on returning fields on every response
#27
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
1
Improving specification goals
#26
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
4
Current ratelimit headers landscape
#25
ioggstream
opened
3 years ago
0
Could Limit be an item instead of a list?
#24
ucarion
closed
2 years ago
4
Avoid exposing limits greater that the ones supported by the service
#23
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
2
Describe RateLimit-Remaining using structured-field-values
#22
ucarion
closed
3 years ago
4
Add docker-compose to test locally
#21
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
0
Use http-core semantics, fix refs
#20
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
1
Time-windows for Remaining?
#19
ucarion
closed
2 years ago
12
Fix: #4. RFC references
#18
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
1
Reference gh-pages
#17
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
0
Fix warnings: long lines, doc references, ...
#16
ioggstream
closed
2 years ago
3
Fix examples (Host header, http-messages, ..)
#15
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
1
Create ghpages.yml
#14
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
0
Add author country
#13
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
2
Fix: #3. s,client application,user agent.
#12
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
0
Define headers dependencies
#11
ioggstream
closed
2 years ago
5
Throttling scope
#10
ioggstream
closed
2 years ago
32
Refine normative language
#9
ioggstream
closed
2 years ago
1
IETF-109 Feedback
#8
ioggstream
closed
2 years ago
1
Add httpapi branch.
#7
ioggstream
closed
3 years ago
0
Use Structured Field syntax
#6
reschke
closed
2 years ago
13
Request examples should include required Host header field
#5
reschke
closed
3 years ago
1
"[RFCxxxx] section yyy" notation
#4
reschke
closed
3 years ago
1
terminology: "client application" -> "user agent"
#3
reschke
closed
3 years ago
2
mention of unregistered status code 430
#2
reschke
closed
3 years ago
2
should refer to draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics instead of RFC 7231
#1
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
Previous