rmalyankar
commented
10 months ago Proposed formulation of checks:
| Check ID | Description | Classification | S-100 Part | S-100 clause |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ? | If CI_Individual is present then at least one of CI_Individual.name, CI_Individual.positionName, or CI_Individual.partyIdentifier must be populated | W | 17 | 4.5 Table 17-2 |
| ? | If CI_Organisation is present then at least one of CI_Organisation.name or CI_Organisation.positionName must be populated | W | 17 | 4.5 Table 17-3 |
| ? | If CI_Organisation is present and neither of CI_Organisation.name and CI_Organisation.positionName is populated then CI_Organisation.partyIdentifier must be populated | W | 17 | 4.5 Table 17-3 |
| ? | If CI_Individual or CI_Organisation is present then contact information within it must be populated with at least one of phone, address, onlineResource, or contactInstructions | W | 17 | 4.5 Tables 17-2, 17-3, Note 2 |
"populated" means the element must be present and its content cannot be empty or blank (cannot consist only of whitespace). (If it has only element content the non-blank requirement applies to the tree under it, i.e., the totality of its sub-elements, sub-sub-elements, etc.) The redundancy of the partyIdentifier check for CI_Organisation is noted and should be clarified in S-100.
LizHahessy
If discovery metadata attributes of type CI_Organisation and CI_Individual are populated their content must conform to Tables 17-2 and 17-3, pages 31-32.
Table and page numbers are as in Ed. 5.0.0.
This may result in more than one check, going by the tables.
Applies to S100_DatasetDiscoveryMetadata.{producingAgency, metadataPointOfContact}