We (Klas - S-101 PT test datasets) have received feedback on an S-164 dataset that indicates the need for some validation enhancements. The problem is that in some datasets is that the RCID is out of range.
In S-58, this is validated by check 5, which is very explicit:
S-101 Annex C Part 1 indicates that S-58 check 5 has been replaced by S100_Dev0047.
I looked at the Github table of S-100 validation checks and found that the ID S100_Dev0047 was used for another check. Perhaps the one above was not considered relevant as it was greyed out? Anyway, I think that the feedback proves that a check for this is needed. As the range of RCID is defined in S-100 Part 10a-4.4, I think this should be a generic S-100 check.
We (Klas - S-101 PT test datasets) have received feedback on an S-164 dataset that indicates the need for some validation enhancements. The problem is that in some datasets is that the RCID is out of range. In S-58, this is validated by check 5, which is very explicit:![image](https://github.com/iho-ohi/S-100-Validation-Checks/assets/75443865/76d2cc14-7dc9-476e-944d-5a01132edc13)
S-101 Annex C Part 1 indicates that S-58 check 5 has been replaced by S100_Dev0047.
I looked at the Github table of S-100 validation checks and found that the ID S100_Dev0047 was used for another check. Perhaps the one above was not considered relevant as it was greyed out? Anyway, I think that the feedback proves that a check for this is needed. As the range of RCID is defined in S-100 Part 10a-4.4, I think this should be a generic S-100 check.