Pull Review

Pull Review assigns pull request reviewers intelligently.

Pull Review looks through the changes in a pull request and assigns the most relevant reviewers, those who have made the largest and most recent contributions to the changed files. The number of reviewers assigned, along with other things, can be configured.

You can use Pull Review through GitHub comments, from chat rooms in Slack/HipChat/etc. using Hubot, on the command line, via API, or as a Docker image.

Installation

npm install pull-review

Usage

First, add a .pull-review configuration file in your repository:

version: 1

reviewers:
  your_github_username: {}

In order to use Pull Review as a Hubot plugin or in server mode, you'll need a GitHub token. The token must have repo, public_repo, read:user, and read:org scopes.

For details on configuration options, check out the configuration section.

GitHub

Pull Review used with GitHub

In your GitHub repository, go to Settings→Webhooks
Click Add webhook
Set Payload URL to the Pull Review server URL (https://pull-review.herokuapp.com)
Set Content type to application/json
Choose Let me select individual events
Pick the Issue comment event
Click Add webhook

To assign reviewers on a pull request, post /review. To run Pull Review again post /review again.

The public Pull Review server limits some configuration options. However, you can run your own server.

Hubot

Pull Review used with Hubot

Add pull-review to your external-scripts.json:

[
  "pull-review"
]

Ensure environment variables are set correctly.

You can request review assignments like this:

review https://github.com/imsky/pull-review/pull/1

You can run Pull Review again on a pull request like this:

review https://github.com/imsky/pull-review/pull/1 again

To notify users on Slack, configuration must include a reviewers section.

Pull Review also adds a pull request preview, for private and public repos.

CLI

npm install --global pull-review

pull-review https://github.com/imsky/pull-review/pull/1

pull-review --help

  Usage: pull-review [options] <pull request URL>

  Options:

    -V, --version                     output the version number
    -r, --retry-review                Retry review
    -d, --dry-run                     Do not assign or notify reviewers
    -t, --github-token <githubToken>  GitHub token to use
    -c, --config-path <configPath>    Pull Review configuration path in repo
    -h, --help                        output usage information

API

var PullReview = require('pull-review');

PullReview({
  pullRequestURL: 'https://github.com/imsky/pull-review/pull/1',

  // run Pull Review on a pull request, unassigning current reviewers first
  retryReview: true,

  // run Pull Review on a pull request, but do not assign or notify reviewers
  dryRun: true,

  // run Pull Review with a specific GitHub token
  githubToken: 'PULL_REVIEW_GITHUB_TOKEN'

  // run Pull Review with a custom Pull Review configuration
  config: {version: 1},

  // specify a different repo location for the Pull Review configuration
  pullReviewConfigPath: 'config/.pull-review'
});

Docker

The Docker image can be used in CLI mode or in server mode.

# get the Pull Review image
docker pull ghcr.io/imsky/pull-review

# run Pull Review on a pull request
docker run -it -e PULL_REVIEW_GITHUB_TOKEN ghcr.io/imsky/pull-review https://github.com/imsky/pull-review/pull/1

# run Pull Review with a specific GitHub token
docker run -it ghcr.io/imsky/pull-review https://github.com/imsky/pull-review/pull/1 --github-token PULL_REVIEW_GITHUB_TOKEN

Server

You can run your own Pull Review server on Heroku or another host.

Ensure environment variables are set correctly.

Start the server with npm start or by running pull-review with no arguments.

The port is 8080 by default, but can be changed using the PORT environment variable.

Configuration

Configuration for Pull Review is a YAML/JSON file named .pull-review at the root of the repo.

Check out .pull-review for a documented example of a config file.

max_files

Maximum number of files to evaluate in order to assign reviewers. Set to 0 for no maximum.

Default: 5

min_reviewers

Minimum number of reviewers to assign.

Default: 1

max_reviewers

Maximum number of reviewers to assign.

Default: 2

max_files_per_reviewer

Maximum number of files per reviewer. If the number of files is over this limit, more reviewers will be assigned up to the maximum number of reviewers. Set to 0 for no maximum.

Default: 0

max_lines_per_reviewer

Maximum number of lines changed across added and modified files per reviewer. If the number of lines is over this limit, more reviewers will be assigned up to the maximum number of reviewers. If max_files_per_reviewer and max_lines_per_reviewer are set, the assignment with the fewest reviewers will be used. Set to 0 for no maximum.

Default: 0

assign_min_reviewers_randomly

If the minimum number of reviewers isn't found, assign reviewers using path fallbacks and/or at random.

Default: true

min_authors_of_changed_files

If the pull request changes code with fewer authors than this minimum, replace already assigned reviewers with a random reviewer. This option helps prevent "review loops" where only a few authors review an area of code.

Default: 0

min_percent_authorship_for_extra_reviewer

If the assigned reviewer has greater percentage authorship of the changed files than this minimum, an extra reviewer will be assigned. This is helpful for files with many authors and one author with majority authorship, making them the default reviewer for those files. Set to 0 to disable.

Default: 0

min_lines_changed_for_extra_reviewer

When using min_authors_of_changed_files or min_percent_authorship_for_extra_reviewer, a small pull request can warrant an extra reviewer if there aren't enough distinct authors of the changed code. However, small pull requests usually don't need more than one reviewer. This option can be used to ensure that an extra reviewer is assigned for pull requests that change at least a minimum of lines of code.

Default: 0

require_notification

Require a user to be listed in the reviewers section in order to be assigned as a reviewer.

Default: true

use_review_requests

Use review requests instead of assignees to assign reviewers to pull requests.

Default: false

reviewers

A map of maps, with the main keys being the GitHub usernames of users, and the child keys providing application-specific contact information. Example:

reviewers:
  alice:
    slack: ajones
  bob: {}
  charlie: "Charlie Smith"

When Pull Review sends its notification, it'll notify @alice on GitHub and @ajones on Slack.

Specifically for Slack, using real names instead of usernames (as in the example above for charlie) is recommended since Slack is phasing out support for @username mentions.

If non-GitHub notification handles are not available/required, an empty object can be specified (as it is for bob in the example above). This will notify @bob on GitHub, and will work with the require_notification configuration option.

Currently only Slack user mapping is supported - for other chat networks like HipChat or IRC, Pull Review will mention the GitHub usernames instead.

review_blacklist

A list of usernames to never notify. This is useful to exclude machine users and users who are on vacation or otherwise unavailable for reviews.

review_path_assignments

A map of lists, where the keys are minimatch (glob) patterns, and the lists include the users to assign. Note: order is important. Example:

review_path_assignments:
  web/server/**:
  - bob

When a file in web/server is found, bob will be assigned before other reviewers.

review_path_fallbacks

A map of lists, where the keys are minimatch (glob) patterns, and the lists include the users to assign. Note: order is important. Example:

review_path_fallbacks:
  web/ui/**:
  - alice

When a file whose path begins with web/ui is found, alice will be assigned if more reviewers are required.

file_blacklist

An array of minimatch (glob) patterns that should be filtered out when retrieving files for a pull request. Blacklisted files will not be considered in Git blame processing, in fallback path processing, or in max files per reviewer or max lines per reviewer calculations. Example:

file_blacklist:
  - web/ui/*.js

label_whitelist

An array of pull request labels that are required for pull request review.

label_blacklist

An array of pull request labels that are forbidden from pull request review.

notification_channels

An array of channels to use for review notifications. The default channels are chat (the same chat channel that Hubot uses, e.g. Slack) and github (a comment on the pull request).

To disable notifications, use an empty array:

notification_channels: []

Environment variables

PULL_REVIEW_GITHUB_TOKEN: GitHub token used to fetch pull request information.
PULL_REVIEW_CONFIG_PATH: location of the config file in the pull request repo (default is .pull-review).
PULL_REVIEW_CONFIG: Pull Review configuration override in JSON/YAML format.
PULL_REVIEW_REQUIRED_ROOMS: whitelist of Hubot chat rooms for Pull Review requests (e.g. dev,ops).

Reviewing again

Sometimes it may be useful to run Pull Review again on a pull request, whether it's because the assigned reviewers are not available to review the PR or because another set of reviewers is necessary. You can run Pull Review again in the following ways:

GitHub: /review again
Hubot: review ... again
CLI: --retry-review or -r
API: retryReview: true

When running Pull Review again, current reviewers are un-assigned, and the next best set of reviewers is assigned instead. Keep in mind that if Pull Review runs twice on a pull request, the original reviewers will be assigned again.

Algorithm

Pull Review was partly inspired by mention-bot, however its algorithm is a bit different.

Get all modified files for a pull request and take the top files with most changes
Get information on which author changed what lines in these files using Git blame data, filtering out older data
Assign authors who have precedence for particular paths
Assign authors who have made the most changes in the top modified files
If there are not enough reviewers, assign more reviewers from path fallback rules
If there are still not enough reviewers, assign at random from a list of all reviewers

Limits can be set on files per reviewer and lines of code per reviewer. This helps by adding reviewers as needed.

Support

Pull Review supports Node.js 8+.

License

MIT

Credits

Made by Ivan Malopinsky.

imsky / pull-review

readme

Pull Review

Installation

Usage

GitHub

Hubot

CLI

API

Docker

Server

Configuration

max_files

min_reviewers

max_reviewers

max_files_per_reviewer

max_lines_per_reviewer

assign_min_reviewers_randomly

min_authors_of_changed_files

min_percent_authorship_for_extra_reviewer

min_lines_changed_for_extra_reviewer

require_notification

use_review_requests

reviewers

review_blacklist

review_path_assignments

review_path_fallbacks

file_blacklist

label_whitelist

label_blacklist

notification_channels

Environment variables

Reviewing again

Algorithm

Support

License

Credits