Should imported terms be displayed in the NIDM-Experiment Specs page?

incf-nidash / nidm-specs

Neuroimaging Data Model (NIDM): describing neuroimaging data and provenance

nidm.nidash.org

Other

33 stars 30 forks source link

Should imported terms be displayed in the NIDM-Experiment Specs page? #476

Closed khelm closed 2 years ago

khelm commented 5 years ago

Currently the NIDM-Experiment Specs page here shows only the NIDM and ontoneurolog-instruments terms (and only to a certain graph depth), but there are terms imported from many more ontologies such as SIO, PATO, QIBO, etc. Should we display the entire graph on this page? I am in favor of this as this would be a way for potential users to see the whole graph without having to load the ontology file in Protege or an RDF viewer. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

cmaumet commented 5 years ago

Yes, I also think it's good to have a high level view of the full graph! Maybe the external terms (or some of them) could appear in the textual spec description rather than in the main chart?

khelm commented 2 years ago

I'm going to close this issue since we're now working on an expandable hierarchy viewer that will include the imported terms.