search

inclusivenaming / website

Website for the Inclusive Naming Initiative
https://inclusivenaming.org/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
28 stars 39 forks source link

add tiered word list critera #92

Closed celestehorgan closed 3 years ago

celestehorgan commented 3 years ago

Signed-off-by: Celeste Horgan celeste@cncf.io

richsalz commented 3 years ago

What's the basis for deciding which tiers apply? "i know it when I see it" ?

rbowen commented 3 years ago

What's the basis for deciding which tiers apply? "i know it when I see it" ?

I would presume that this determination would be made in discussion with the language workstream. There's no one "right" answer to any of these things.

richsalz commented 3 years ago

That's fine, if that's what happened, but allowing peopl3e t

What's the basis for deciding which tiers apply? "i know it when I see it" ?

I would presume that this determination would be made in discussion with the language workstream. There's no one "right" answer to any of these things.

That's fine, but it should be explicit in the doc.

We all know the Dewey Decimal system was arbitrary, but it was still incredibly useful.

The doc should say how things were categorized.

KAth1277 commented 3 years ago

That's fine, if that's what happened, but allowing peopl3e t

What's the basis for deciding which tiers apply? "i know it when I see it" ?

I would presume that this determination would be made in discussion with the language workstream. There's no one "right" answer to any of these things.

That's fine, but it should be explicit in the doc.

We all know the Dewey Decimal system was arbitrary, but it was still incredibly useful.

The doc should say how things were categorized.

That's a good point. It could have a statement that the initial list was developed and categorized by X working group or similar, and then specify when new words are being proposed for inclusion the proposing party can suggest the categorization and then it's confirmed by the WG - or some other process as applicable. That way it's clear the history and the process moving forward.

celestehorgan commented 3 years ago

That's fine, if that's what happened, but allowing peopl3e t

What's the basis for deciding which tiers apply? "i know it when I see it" ?

I would presume that this determination would be made in discussion with the language workstream. There's no one "right" answer to any of these things.

That's fine, but it should be explicit in the doc.

We all know the Dewey Decimal system was arbitrary, but it was still incredibly useful.

The doc should say how things were categorized.

At the moment, it would be the call of the language WS and those writing/reviewing the recommendations.

richsalz commented 3 years ago

At the moment, it would be the call of the language WS and those writing/reviewing the recommendations.

That's fine, but I would really like it to say something like "Classified by the language workstream of INI" or something. It also gives us another chance to say "if you don't like it, come join us" :)

cas-- commented 3 years ago

Has no-one noticed that this change has broken links to the word-list so it cannot be found now...