Closed aheusingfeld closed 11 years ago
-1, that seems to be overkill to me.
seems to be overkill to me
I'd say a "nice to have, priority 472*"
'* NOTE: prio 1 is the highest ;)
No, I disagree. Adding features with that priority overcomplicates the whole thing. It's like adding (optional) support for followers, retweets, etc.; all potentially useful, but don't pass the "do we really need this" test.
A link shortener as a separate project: That could be useful.
A link shortener as a separate project: That could be useful.
Ok, agree on that! Don't want to let others track us via their shorteners.
As mentioned in https://intern.innoq.com/statuses/updates/975, some links might even be longer than 140 chars.
Therefore we should introduce an optional link shortener service. This could e.g. be a button "shorten links". This way the author is free to decide whether he wants to use the shortener or not.