Closed aheusingfeld closed 9 years ago
unfortunately it's based on the commits for #71
Presumably that's only because you're afraid of rewriting history? Go ahead, there's no regulatory interference to worry about here...
you're afraid of rewriting history
Actually I'm just too lazy for the merge-conflict I got locally. ^^
Heh - however, since #71's history is gonna be rewritten, you're SOL anyway...
yes
Is included in #77
https://github.com/aheusingfeld/statuses/commit/bb3a3f61c7ea99daf555733d6df121d8e8c5666f fixes #56 but unfortunately it's based on the commits for #71