Open nfrisby opened 4 years ago
This is kind of a matter of perspective. I have always thought that one endorses a proposal by forging a block with the correct protocol version. E.g. "endorsement" is simply a measure of how many nodes are using that version. So from that perspective the comment is correct. However, we could perhaps elaborate this.
with the correct protocol version
using that version
@nc6 By "with/use", do you mean that the nodes have started to use the new proposed protocol parameter values even though the ledger rules have not yet adopted those values? I think this is impossible in general. Consider an update proposal that increases ppMaxBlockSize
. If a node has adopted the new value prematurely, it might create a block that the ledger rules' currently-adopted protocol parameter values judge to be invalid.
Ah, I see. Yes, when you think of protocol parameters, I agree this is incorrect
https://github.com/input-output-hk/cardano-ledger/blob/172b49ff1b6456851f10ae18f920fbfa733be0b0/cardano-ledger/src/Cardano/Chain/Block/Header.hs#L145-L146
That comment is incorrect. The field is only used to endorse parameter update proposals, not to document how the current block was forged.
(I'm not sure if the corresponding
headerSoftwareVersion
comment is also incorrect; I'm looking into that now.)