Open k-okada opened 8 years ago
Is this related / a duplicate of #58?
Yes, this is fixed version of #58, I updated the first comment with rviz images, any comments are welcome.
Ah, ok.
You probably want to check that kinetic_dev doesn't already contain these changes.
this PR conflicts with https://github.com/ipa320/softkinetic/commits/kinetic_dev which includes #58, I think #58 did not support following two points, which I think definition of 'kinect-like' style
@k-okada is the camera frame of soft kinetic converted to third one? is this kinect-like?
As far as I understand , point cloud should have
ok, thank you.
:+1: I'm for this PR. Sorry for my misunderstanding about kinect-like camera frame.
There are several atttempt to support 'kinect-like' settings, https://github.com/ipa320/softkinetic/pull/44, https://github.com/ipa320/softkinetic/pull/58
I think the definition of kinect-like consists of
Here is the examples from openni2.launch
https://github.com/ipa320/softkinetic/pull/63/commits/159419179d0312b40dba932c9bb3cd9d4963f7ad includes
which indicates the translation between rgb and depth frames is '0.00180 0 0.005' which may differ from the urdf settings (0.0250 displacement), I'm not sure if this parameter is general one, but at least for my camera, it improve the depth-camera registration
0.0250 displacement (see left bottom camera iamge which overay point cloud into camera image)![screenshot from 2016-06-09 14 38 06](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/493276/15926014/a8d03800-2e74-11e6-9077-102eff033268.png)
0.00180 0 0.005 displacement![screenshot from 2016-06-09 14 36 52](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/493276/15926026/c245d240-2e74-11e6-9a2e-28f594bda235.png)