search

ipld / roadmap

IPLD Project Roadmap
10 stars 2 forks source link

wip: 2020 q1 OKR’s #21

Closed mikeal closed 4 years ago

mikeal commented 4 years ago

Need to get OKR’s in for the rest of the quarter’s work.

Please edit and add @creationix @vmx @rvagg @warpfork

rvagg commented 4 years ago

have pushed a second CAR OKR; mine are pretty unambitious but I think I'd like to discuss how important these OKRs are at this current time.

rvagg commented 4 years ago

... just noticed that my pushes have failed but I wasn't paying attention previously.. @mikeal we need to expand access rights to this repo.

I have two commits so far: https://github.com/ipld/roadmap/compare/2020-q1-okr-init...rvagg:2020-q1-okr-init - I added a new one for docs but set it as 0.3 expected so it's mainly just a placeholder reminder that this should get done some time this year.

vmx commented 4 years ago

@mikeal What do you think about removing my "Rust IPLD is feature complete" from the list (as we also don't even have a definition what feature compleness means) and rather add something like "Rust CID and Rust Multihash are maintained and usable". With "maintained" I mean, PRs merged, existing forks incorporated.

mikeal commented 4 years ago

@vmx notice that the expected completion rate by the end of the quarter is only 30% - part of what I’d like to have by the end of the quarter is a definition of what “feature complete” might be considered ;) “maintained and usable” make it sound like feature work is done and we’re in maintenance mode, which isn’t the state of the stack right now as I understand it.

rvagg commented 4 years ago

pushed my changes, needs to be squashed when merging tho

vmx commented 4 years ago

@mikeal Then perhaps the KR is just "have a metric for feature complete"? Though I'm not sure if it's actually worth spending time spelling that out. Immediate needs change a lot, so even a roadmap doesn't make much sense. It's more of a "make progress on the implementation, we should evaluate after the quarter if there was any progress and if not ring the alarm bells" (which doesn't fit into the OKR model).

mikeal commented 4 years ago

Immediate needs change a lot, so even a roadmap doesn't make much sense. It's more of a "make progress on the implementation, we should evaluate after the quarter if there was any progress and if not ring the alarm bells" (which doesn't fit into the OKR model).

yes, there’s not a great match between the way we need to do this and the ORK model which is why i’m relying on fuzzy language like “feature complete” ;)