Visually, it looks that the null 3D volume represents acq-MTon_MTS:
The first 3D volume represents acq-MToff_MTS:
And the second 3D volume represents acq-T1w_MTS:
4D images are not optimal for processing, e.g., for the co-registration to T2w (which does not work for 4D images). I suggest splitting the 4D image into three individual images.
Additionally, to be compliant with the proposed derivatives conventions, I would use the following naming for the MT images:
acq-MT_MTS.nii.gz
images for the Calgary site (GE Discovery scanner) are 4D, see:Visually, it looks that the null 3D volume represents
acq-MTon_MTS
:The first 3D volume represents
acq-MToff_MTS
:And the second 3D volume represents
acq-T1w_MTS
:4D images are not optimal for processing, e.g., for the co-registration to T2w (which does not work for 4D images). I suggest splitting the 4D image into three individual images.
Additionally, to be compliant with the proposed derivatives conventions, I would use the following naming for the MT images:
(This would also include renaming the MT images for other sites and updating the git-annex dataset)